Skip to content

Platform

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

8 results found

  1. We would like to see at least one additional level of hierarchy on top of Teams in Playvox. If you are working with several bigger regional teams or clients in one Playvox instance, we would want a Group level for the regional client and below that Teams to Group agents with their Supervisors. Currently we would need separate instances for those cases which means we will loose out on comparing between Groups in the Playvox reporting. Also ross-group calibrations are more difficult.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there!

    Thank you for sharing your valuable ideas with us!

    We appreciate your input and believe that every idea contributes to making Playvox even better.

    We at the Product Team regularly assess and prioritize features based on user feedback. Rest assured that your idea will be carefully evaluated alongside others. If it gains traction among our user community through votes, it could significantly influence our development roadmap.

    Thanks for being a valuable part of our community.

    Karina from Product

  2. The settings allow the deactivation of a high (unlimited) amount of users, but there is no option to revert it or activate users vía .csv file, just one by one which is very time-consuming.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there!

    Thank you for sharing your valuable ideas with us!

    We appreciate your input and believe that every idea contributes to making Playvox even better.

    We at the Product Team regularly assess and prioritize features based on user feedback. Rest assured that your idea will be carefully evaluated alongside others. If it gains traction among our user community through votes, it could significantly influence our development roadmap.

    Thanks for being a valuable part of our community.

    Karina from Product

  3. We have experienced in the past the following problem: The system allows to create a user profile even if it already exists, this is called "cloned user", however we cannot edit certain fields of the cloned user profile neither can we access the original user and edit from there. Solution: Ability to edit those fields in the profile of either the cloned user or the original user, or inability for us to create "cloned users" (unless cloned users are needed for another purpose).

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there!

    Thank you for sharing your valuable ideas with us! 

    We appreciate your input and believe that every idea contributes to making Playvox even better.

    We at the Product Team regularly assess and prioritize features based on user feedback. Rest assured that your idea will be carefully evaluated alongside others. If it gains traction among our user community through votes, it could significantly influence our development roadmap.

    Thanks for being a valuable part of our community.

    Karina from Product

  4. Bulk updates are limited to a total of 300 agents in the same file which isn´t a sufficient amount for our BPO groups so we have to update one group through several files what makes it very inefficient.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Its very time consuming and frustrating to have to remove everyone from 'All Users' everytime we create new accounts, along with manually sending invites, its another step to the process.

    We don't want the All Users team, but have been told we have to have it, yet we remove everyone from it, can all users going to this team be an option rather than automatic?

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Employee id field is available and can be filled in the User Details section but is not visible in the Edit User page after saving it. We need to enter again in the User details section to view it. Moreover, the field is not available to display in the Manage Users table, even if it's included in the .xls file after data export.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. At present its a painful process to create accounts and then have to manually go into another screen to send them an invite.

    Could there be a field to click to automatically send an invite when the account is created? Or when you bulk create new accounts there would be another column confirming to send an invite automatically?

    Or even the ability to sort the 'Pending invitation' list in to 'send invite' and 'resend invite'?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Currently there is only an option to deactivate users. However, if there are issues with SSO provisioning users need to be removed completely. The only way to do this is via Playvox support which takes time and hurts our internal SLA for issue solving and means that users might not be able to use PlayVox on time/when needed.
    If at least Super_Admins had the option to completely delete users, this would solve that issue.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?