Skip to content

Quality

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

307 results found

  1. Currently finding that when we run a report on all of our signed evaluations, it includes agents that have been removed from the platform that are no longer with the team. We are hoping for a way to pull a list of unsigned evaluations and have it only be current active users.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  1 comment  ·  Reports  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. To be able to do a coaching session on specific disputes while in the dispute process. This will allow the arbitrator or admin to be able to discuss more quickly the specific issue or dispute that occurred.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Disputes  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Create a more efficient way for larger groups of analysts to be updated & managed within workload creation & edits as team changes happen

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. The ability to filter Interactions in PlayVox by Intercom teams and/or groups. It will be easier to evaluate specific agents and teams.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Started  ·  1 comment  ·  Filters  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Having a new variant for "fail all". This new option would show the QA score for the agents but still indicate that the evaluation is not approved. example: The agent fails because a critical mistake was made and the evaluation is not approved. It shows that the agent scored 0/60 points but they still get a QA score to indicate how they are doing overall.

    We believe this would be a benefit for agents as it gives them something to measure their performance against, even if there has been a critical error.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Scorecards  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. A format for coaching between experts and analysts. One idea that would be helpful is a way for analysts to request support/coaching with an evaluation and the expert being able to provide guidance on how to score within view of the scorecard/evaluation; overlaying how the expert would score real time. Making the expert notes viewable only by the current analyst + others with analyst role + team leaders. And a way to be able to track these supported evaluations as data + note reasons the coaching was initiated by analyst.
    Currently these escalated reviews of evaluations and how to score…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Coaching  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. It would be nice to directly chat with the agent from the Dispute tab. In our company the Disputes are solved by a 3rd party and not the initial analyst. That's why communication between the 3rd party and the agent would be amazing.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Disputes  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. While having the ability to review the evaluations of QA specialists is super helpful, it would be especially beneficial to have the ability to save reviews as drafts before sending them!

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Evaluations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Set a rule for arbitrators to have an specific amount of days to review an open dispute

    13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  1 comment  ·  Disputes  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Exporting data from calibrations: we need the granular data from our calibrations, like a comparison between the analyst evaluation and expert evaluation; and separated analyst answers and expert answers;

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Calibrations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. I love the new Reports section of Workloads, showing the completion percentages for my analysts. What I'd like to see there is an option to set completion percentage targets for assigned workloads; for example, those with 0-30% of their assigned evaluations are in red, those with 31-60% are in yellow, etc. It would allow for at-a-glance checks on how the analysts are doing and call attention to those who are behind.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Reports  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Ability to pull a report showing all the evaluations that have been deleted, who deleted, when deleted and even some details of the evaluation - agent name, date of eval, quality score etc?

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Reports  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Scorecard templates are currently restricted to those provided by Playvox. Need ability to create custom templates. Yes, we can create a "template" scorecard and clone it but it is not a pleasant user experience.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Scorecards  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. It's very difficult to determine what percentage has already been assigned amongst QAs in the workloads. With 40+ QAs, it is very difficult how many more percentage has to be assigned/deassigned to reach 100%

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Currently the Workloads API can only return information of workloads that have ran. If scheduled workload information is retrievable, it will help with sampling and managing the workloads before it runs.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Analysts are skipping interactions that they consider too hard, too long or too low scoring and don't want to score, approving will make it easier to track

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  1 comment  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. To be able to delete massively workloads insted of one by one.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Branch questions inside scorecards

    *Dependent questions on quality forms *

    13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Scorecards  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Users are able to edit evaluations after it is signed by agents. Since evaluation has been signed, the result has been accepted by the agent. Users should not be able to edit evaluations afterwards. If the edit was a markdown, then it will record as agent acknowledging the markdown and non disputable.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Evaluations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. How disputes should be used:
    The function should be used for disputes as well as for clarification requests and general questions regarding a certain question or section in an evaluation.
    The agent can create a dispute without choosing any specific topic (dispute, clarification, general question). After a dispute is received, the evaluator can then change it to a clarification request, if applicable.
    Problem:
    Employees are a bit scared to use the feature as they assume it is only for pure disputes. They don't open a dispute for unclear cases (clarification) because they think it would be too big of a…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  1 comment  ·  Disputes  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?