Skip to content

Quality

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

59 results found

  1. Reports per team should allow drilling down into the actual evaluations, as this is set for Reports per agent. In order to look at the actual evaluations filtered by team trends, we have to export the raw data.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Reports  ·  Admin →

    Hey!

    I'm excited to announce that this feature has been completed and released!

    When navigating the team report within the new quality reports experience you will be able to drill down from each of the report's graphs to the evaluations considered in the sample.


    Please let me know what are your thoughts on this new experience and if it aligns with your needs!

    Warm regards,

    Pauli :)

  2. Currently, there is no way to download/export the submitted reviews. We would like to have this enhancement to analyze the re-auditor findings in more detail.

    14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Evaluations  ·  Admin →
  3. Add reporting for required feedback options on scorecard. Ex: when points aren't given and an analyst gets prompted to give feedback, they select the main reason for the deduction. Would like to see what the main contributors are to errors (something like a more detailed version of coaching opportunities by question in advanced reports)

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Reports  ·  Admin →
  4. We would like to request that similar to agents receiving notifications in their email when n evaluation was done, dispute should also send email notification to email addresses of all respective stakholders.

    15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Disputes  ·  Admin →
  5. We need to create multiple workloads that are similar (ex. QAs assigned, scheduled time, etc.). Ability to clone workloads will lessen the time required to create them. Currently, they all have to be manually recreated.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
  6. The client wants to be able to change the time on the workload for an earlier one.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →

    Hello!


    We have good news. This was recently released.

    You can check it out in the Workloads section.


    Regards,

    Ari from Product Management.

  7. We currently have a 7 day period set for advisors to raise a dispute on an evaluation. We were given the understanding that the facility within Playvox allows us to control the submission of disputes automatically.

    However we have since discovered that the restriction only applies to the advisor starting the dispute within the evaluation and not when they submit it.

    If started within the 7 days, they can in fact then submit it whenever they wish, meaning we are getting disputes submitted weeks and months after the audit was created.

    This seems to make the function redundant as we…

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Disputes  ·  Admin →
  8. Once the next scheduled run time is set (either by us or Playvox) and saved, the schedule cannot be rescheduled to an earlier time

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
  9. Ability to archive workloads vs deleting to have the historical data from them and also to reactivate them if needed in the future

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
  10. We would like to be able to change the expert, or assign a pool of Experts to our calibrations.
    We have a team of Quality Team Leaders, who run the same calibration with their individual teams each week on the same customer contact. They then come together and determine the final expert score between them, and due to holiday/sickness etc it would be great for a pool of users to be able to either be an expect on any calibration, or to be able to assign several users as an expert on a calibration.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Calibrations  ·  Admin →
  11. I would like for there to be a feature where once you have started a workload and finished your first evaluation, it automatically goes to the next evaluation in the workload.
    Currently, once I finish with an evaluation, I have to go back to the workload and start a new evaluation which creates unnecessary steps and has proven to be inefficient for my workflow.

    13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →

    Hey! 

    I'm excited to announce that this feature has been completed and released! 

    Now you'll be able to efficiently evaluate tickets within a workload assignment, reducing time, effort, and clicks while completing this process! 


    Please let me know what are your thoughts on this new experience and if it aligns with your needs! 


    Warm regards, 

    Pauli :) 

     

  12. Include the date of when the evaluation was signed by the agent on the export report or Playvox Evalaution reports.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Evaluations  ·  Admin →

    Hello, 


    Since the last release this is available in the Evaluation export csv file.


    Regards,

    Ariel from Product Management

  13. It would be great if we can have a deadline tab for the workload list to filter the workloads and re-arrange the workload list depending deadline date.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
  14. When there are multiple analysts assigned to a workload, it would be great to have the ability to swap or relinquish an evaluation for a particular employee to another analyst. The purpose would be to eliminate potential bias, in the event that the analyst is the agent's direct manager or if there is a conflict between those parties that could lead to an assumption of bias.

    14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
  15. Have the ability to view and export the scorecard in a pdf format and print it. This is useful for meetings and for employee training sessions.
    Adding an edit

    18 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Scorecards  ·  Admin →
  16. Adding the date the evaluation is submitted. Currently when viewing the tab it is only possible to see the date the evaluation is created but this causes a slight issue when a QA starts an evaluation on the Monday and only submits it a few days after.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Evaluations  ·  Admin →

    Hello. 


    Now you can see the created and submitted date of the evaluation inside the Evaluation log of each new evaluation.


    Regards.

    Ari from Product Management

  17. We can add header filters in scorecards which we can use to filter evaluations in the evaluations tab however it would be beneficial to be able to filter on these in reports much like we can custom filters within the scorecard.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Reports  ·  Admin →
  18. Show both reviewer and analysts full name in the dashboard. We have multiple people with the same name. Add ability to show username when their name is hovered over. We have multiple people with same first name and last name.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
  19. We can create skipping categories in settings, but analysts still need to add a comment when skipping an interaction, this is an extra unnecessary step when you have the quantitative data from the categories you set. Having the option to remove this as mandatory in settings would be ideal for each client to personalise as needed.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
  20. Marking evaluations that have received coaching. When a coach has selected an evaluation for Quality coaching, it should show in the Evaluation overview next to QA Creation date adding a Coaching date. This would help identifying if all critical quality coaching has been done and if it was done on time. As we are working with COPC guidelines, it would be very important to have a fast overview if all failed QAs have been coached on time.

    15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Evaluations  ·  Admin →

    Hello!


    We have good news. This was recently released.

    You can check it out in the Evaluations section.


    Regards,

    Ari from Product Management.

  • Don't see your idea?