347 results found
-
Improve the consistency of the header names between the Evaluator Review export and the Playvox report
There is an inconsistency in the naming of fields in the Evaluator review reporting. Specifically, there is a discrepancy between the field names in the Playvox review tab and the header names in the Export report. For instance, the field called "Reviewer" in the Playvox report is referred to as "Analyst" in the export report. Another example is the field called "Analyst" in the Playvox report is named "Reviewed_by" in the export report. This lack of clarity can easily result in reporting mistakes.
1 vote -
Review tab filters (Evaluate the analyst)
Currently, when exporting Evaluate the analyst reviews, there are very limited filter options. The biggest pain point is that there is no date range filter, so every export contains ALL completed reviews to date, which is far from ideal as it is not efficient and leads to additional manual work to isolate the required date range. I would like to recommend the addition of a date range filter and another filter for the Reviewer so that we can track and trend Reviewer productivity and scoring trends.
3 votes -
Export should include highlights
The exported file should include any highlights and the comments that were attached.
1 vote -
Button to exclude 'Not applicable' during 'Scorecard overview' report
The current view shows N/A as part of the calculation. Would be great to have a button to exclude 'Not applicable' if needed so that the % of occurrence would show only the % from when the question was applicable.
2 votes -
Ability for admin to bypass SAML
The ability for an admin/super admin to bypass SAML rather than having to reach out to Playvox support. If there is an issue during SSO set up our internal IT team can't login to resolve it.
1 vote -
deletion
Our security team requires we delete (or securely archive) old evaluation data. Deleting thousands of evaluations individually is not feasible.
A process to bulk (securely archive) or delete evaluations is necessary for many organizations from a compliance perspective!
2 votes -
Automated Quality Coaching Recommendations
The user can set the percentage that triggers the coaching session recommendation
Options to trigger the coaching recomendation:
Question or section score
critical fail5 votes -
Add internal note to evaluations that are scheduled
Ability to add an internal note to evaluations that are scheduled vs. completed
2 votes -
Enroll in a course If X specific custom field option is chosen in an evaluation
If X specific custom field option is chosen in an evaluation, enroll in a course
Example: If I create a custom field name "soft skills", I can create a rule to enroll agent at "soft skills" course when I selected that field on evaluation
0 votes -
notify If X specific custom field option is chosen in an evaluation
If X specific custom field option is chosen in an evaluation send an specific notification/email
0 votes -
% (PERCENT) OF EVALUATIONS PER TEAM MEMBER
Assign not the # but percent of evaluations, like 5% per previous week
1 vote -
Ability to Adjust Dispute Notifications
Currently QA Leadership (i.e. Admins, Super Admins) is not notified when a dispute is submitted, but they assign arbitrators and review submissions. Adding notifications for them is important for timely management of disputes.
8 votes -
Ability to substitute interactions
Add the ability to substitute a manually located interaction ID into an existing workload. When workload generated interactions aren't within scoring parameters, the substituted interaction will count as an evaluation in that workload. This would make Workload Reporting display an accurate % of evaluations completed.
4 votes -
excel naming convention
the evaluation export function creates excel spreadsheets with very long naming conventions. If you pull the same report a few says later, it has the same name. Excel cannot have 2 workbooks open with the same name. please can each unique download be given a unique file name
1 vote -
Add display of agents who are expected to have interactions assigned, but no available interactions were found
When workloads are assigned to specific agents within a team, but not the entire team, it's difficult to figure out which agents don't have interactions available, but are supposed to.
In the image of agent assignments, the first two 0/0 are on the team, but were never added to interaction assignments in the workload configuration. An agent who was added to assignments and should have 4/4 but has 0, will also show as 0/0. Adding a clear distinction of who is missing interactions will make it much easier to follow up.
2 votes -
Delete workloads
Want to delete workloads that not needed anymore (or have like a trash button) https://flmst.net/s/2ZHqMarjHdPFXmR/preview
Without assignments deleted immediately. They are annoying.
2 votes -
Skip evalutation
When you're skipping one chat/ticket in workload, another one is not
loading instead of skipped one, and that reduce the total amount of chats.3 votes -
Scheduled Scorecards Publishing
It'd be great if we can schedule when a new scorecard will be published and the previous version archived. This can help us to avoid having multiple excel files in a work week when exporting the data.
1 vote -
Ability to use Toolbar one question lev (e.g., thick, color, font size etc., especially insert link and upload files).
Unlock the toolbar also for the comment fields at individual questions of the scorecard. The toolbar in the summary is really cool. The functions would also be handy in the individual comments to make them more organized. We give most of our feedback on question level and would therefore benefit a lot from the toolbar.
4 votes -
interactions - description field
Description in Response history looks different from response history in the interactions:
The description in the interactions displays with the descriptions style : spaces\ new lines\ bold text and more1 vote
- Don't see your idea?