27 results found
-
When a dispute is submitted an email should be sent to the supervisor/team leader or others that have permissions.
When a dispute is submitted there is no notification via email to the valid parties and sometimes they are missed.
I think an email should be sent to the Analyst's Team Leader to prevent disputes being missed.
18 votes -
Evaluate the Analyst Dispute feature
Can we have a Dispute functionality enabled for the Evaluate the Analyst workloads? This would help the Analyst to Dispute their evaluation with the evaluator and seek for score change.
14 votes -
Dispute add time frame for arbitrator to review
Set a rule for arbitrators to have an specific amount of days to review an open dispute
13 votes -
Show Evaluation info inside Dispute
Would like to be able to view the evaluation that came from the dispute within the same tab itself in order to recall the interaction versus having to open another tab and toggle between both.
11 votes -
Level 2 Dispute
It would be good if agents can make an appeal or can still comment after a dispute has been resolved.
There are instances that agents still have concerns or questions after their disputes get resolved but there is no way for them or evaluators to re-open the cases.
10 votes -
Advanced Dispute Reporting
Currently, the information from the dispute export is fairly limited. Being able to export data such as which question(s) were disputed would be helpful in seeing trends with agents or evaluators. This way, we can see if it is a specific question that an agent or evaluator may have a misunderstanding of, or if there are other factors that may affect a certain question being disputed more frequently than others.
9 votes -
Ability to Adjust Dispute Notifications
Currently QA Leadership (i.e. Admins, Super Admins) is not notified when a dispute is submitted, but they assign arbitrators and review submissions. Adding notifications for them is important for timely management of disputes.
8 votes -
Disputes be dated from the date they were submitted and not the original evaluation date
Someone else mentioned below regarding the timeframe to start a dispute. I wanted to also include an enhancement regarding how disputes are dated. Currently I'm running into the issue of missing disputes - I'm not sure when they were submitted AND recent disputes are not being shown week over week because they're dated based on the evaluation date and not when the dispute was submitted. This has been an issue with keeping up with disputes and missing them months later. This has metrics impact with updating data from prior months.
8 votes -
Use different term than "Rejected"
Our quality is heavily soft skill focused, and the Red "Rejected" notice is not ideal. I wonder if a different term could be used instead. Even "Denied" or "No changes warranted" might be less abrasive. Also, maybe a different color than red?
8 votes -
Connect Coaching to Disputes
To be able to do a coaching session on specific disputes while in the dispute process. This will allow the arbitrator or admin to be able to discuss more quickly the specific issue or dispute that occurred.
8 votes -
Disputes report
Disputes - Report on Trends
On Disputes report, show Original and New Score
In the Dispute, Quality functionality- would it be possible to display reporting on what 'closed' disputes were deemed 'valid/invalid' by the arbitrator? And create coachings off of the valid disputes?
If multiple points of an evaluation were disputed ie. in different or the same sections of the dispute and were deemed valid while others were not, there would have to be a display of these details as well.
It would also be ideal if the dispute functionality could connect to the coaching functionality so that if a…8 votes -
dispute
Allow Disputes to edit the evaluation either up or down - currently can only accept a change and increase the score, but if the dispute is incorrect and the score should be lower, we cannot make that change. This is for when using a score range.
3 votes -
Disputes - Change the name or add an option to make the function seem less negative / extreme
How disputes should be used:
The function should be used for disputes as well as for clarification requests and general questions regarding a certain question or section in an evaluation.
The agent can create a dispute without choosing any specific topic (dispute, clarification, general question). After a dispute is received, the evaluator can then change it to a clarification request, if applicable.
Problem:
Employees are a bit scared to use the feature as they assume it is only for pure disputes. They don't open a dispute for unclear cases (clarification) because they think it would be too big of a…3 votes -
Mandatory Dispute Categories
An option to enable Mandatory Dispute Categories
3 votes -
Add Interaction ID to disputes
My team and I are using the PlayVox disputes page, and to be able to analyze the disputes we need the interaction ID to be implemented, which would be, for example, pusher-chats.5db5ba31-152e-4baf-9464-677ed65dbd6e. 20230913191139.
What we want is for an Interaction id column to be added next to the Evaluation column on the disputes page or within the Excel file, since there is an export to excel option.
I am sending a screenshot of the disputes page where the Interaction id column should be in accordance with my suggestion. Thanks
2 votes -
Dispute Closed Date
We would like to have the Closed Date for the disputes that are completed. This could be added on the Dispute details (when you open them) or as a column on the Disputes table.
2 votes -
Turn Disputes on by Platform
Ability to turn Quality Disputes on or off by scorecard, not by role.
2 votes -
Disputes - In addition to the Analyst, the Manager can be flagged.
Zocdoc is looking for that when the agent opens a dispute and it goes directly to the original evaluator, it can also flag someone else in the team, in this case a manager.
2 votes -
100% Evaluation
Cannot open a dispute, if there is a 100% evaluation, but quality manager cannot see something, so teamleader re-checked, and open dispute to lower the score.
2 votes -
Remember filter settings when going back to the page.
Do not reset the filters when revisiting the page. For example in Dispute Reports, when I review the dispute it opens in the same tab. When I go back to the previous page it resets the filter and have to redo them. This behavior is also inconsistent across the platform as some pages do remember filter settings.
2 votes
- Don't see your idea?