304 results found
-
Advanced Dispute Reporting
Currently, the information from the dispute export is fairly limited. Being able to export data such as which question(s) were disputed would be helpful in seeing trends with agents or evaluators. This way, we can see if it is a specific question that an agent or evaluator may have a misunderstanding of, or if there are other factors that may affect a certain question being disputed more frequently than others.
9 votes -
9 votes
-
Ability to Adjust Dispute Notifications
Currently QA Leadership (i.e. Admins, Super Admins) is not notified when a dispute is submitted, but they assign arbitrators and review submissions. Adding notifications for them is important for timely management of disputes.
8 votes -
Disputes be dated from the date they were submitted and not the original evaluation date
Someone else mentioned below regarding the timeframe to start a dispute. I wanted to also include an enhancement regarding how disputes are dated. Currently I'm running into the issue of missing disputes - I'm not sure when they were submitted AND recent disputes are not being shown week over week because they're dated based on the evaluation date and not when the dispute was submitted. This has been an issue with keeping up with disputes and missing them months later. This has metrics impact with updating data from prior months.
8 votes -
Score Breakdown in Evaluation Notification
We currently have 2 questions that zero the scorecard, but agents are finding this very demotivating and the 0% score overrides all the good they have achieved in the other 10 questions.
Would it be possible to present the score in the notification email, and within Playvox, broken down into 2 parts?
e.g.
Your quality score (Q1-10) is 80%
Your compliance score is 0%
Your overall score is 0%Your quality score (Q1-10) is 95%
Your compliance score is N/a
Your overall score is 95%8 votes -
Use different term than "Rejected"
Our quality is heavily soft skill focused, and the Red "Rejected" notice is not ideal. I wonder if a different term could be used instead. Even "Denied" or "No changes warranted" might be less abrasive. Also, maybe a different color than red?
8 votes -
Blind Audits
Hide the name of the agent during the Evaluation process, as this will reduce the bias between Monitor and Agent.
8 votes -
Connect Coaching to Disputes
To be able to do a coaching session on specific disputes while in the dispute process. This will allow the arbitrator or admin to be able to discuss more quickly the specific issue or dispute that occurred.
8 votes -
Disputes report
Disputes - Report on Trends
On Disputes report, show Original and New Score
In the Dispute, Quality functionality- would it be possible to display reporting on what 'closed' disputes were deemed 'valid/invalid' by the arbitrator? And create coachings off of the valid disputes?
If multiple points of an evaluation were disputed ie. in different or the same sections of the dispute and were deemed valid while others were not, there would have to be a display of these details as well.
It would also be ideal if the dispute functionality could connect to the coaching functionality so that if a…8 votes -
Evaluation Preview
Evaluation preview option before sending the evaluation
8 votes -
Scorecard hierarchical custom fields
Custom field options triggers options in another custom fields
7 votes -
Reports per team
Reports per team should allow drilling down into the actual evaluations, as this is set for Reports per agent. In order to look at the actual evaluations filtered by team trends, we have to export the raw data.
6 votes -
Restrict the result view for participants of a calibration to their own result only
Currently calibrations results form part of our auditors KPI's. Being able to see how everyone else is performing in calibrations is causing problems and could mean we are unable to continue to move from our calibrations from our current platform, and into Playvox.
Please can there be the ability within roles management to set what any role can view eg: own, team, all. Thank you.6 votes -
Populate links within email/customer interaction when reviewing evaluations
A few of my analysts and myself have come across the issue of hyperlinks not showing up when evaluating. Portions of the interaction that are hyperlinked look like plain, regular text while evaluating and appears as though there aren't any when there are.
This has caused unintentional mark offs for agents for not including a link to resources when there was in the Salesforce case. This has only become a recent issue. If possible, can we have the hyperlinks included (again) when evaluating? It does appear to show in the interaction itself before clicking to start evaluation but not during…6 votes -
New type of sampling -> Percentage or exact number of evaluation by team
We'd like to have an additional type of sampling function based on the "Percentage or exact number of evaluation by team", not by team member or by filter as these are the options available now.
6 votes -
Large Team Workload Automations
Create a more efficient way for larger groups of analysts to be updated & managed within workload creation & edits as team changes happen
6 votes -
Reports filtered by integrations meta-data
Allow to use specific meta-data as filter for report views
ellos tiene unos forms en zendesk y los usan para creat filtros, entonces ahi les comente que pueden crear scorecards dedicadas también
REPORTING: Can we filter reports/agent dashboards? For example, can we filter an agents dashboard by Ticket Form to see their performance with specific ticket types?
Right now there is no easy ability to take QA scores and cross-reference them with key Zendesk information, be that simply tagging based (ie: show me QA scores for THESE contacts with THESE tags *or* show me QA scores for tickets with a…
6 votes -
Ability to Create Quality Forms (Scorecard) Without Scores
Currently, we can't perform quality checks in Playvox without assigning scores. However, our quality process doesn't involve scoring agents; we focus on capturing criteria without emphasizing scores. It would be great if Playvox could support this by allowing assessments without associated scores, making it easier to align with our approach and minimizing disruptions.
5 votes -
Ability to edit Participation list for Calibration
Participation lists for Calibrations have been implemented (yay!) but they cannot be edited or deleted after creation. We need this to be added ASAP
5 votes -
Changing the user/agent selected even after evaluation is saved/sent
Changing the user/agent selected even after evaluation is saved/sent.
We should be able to change the user/agent selected even after evaluation is saved/sent. We can currently change the date, time, link to the interaction, etc. BUT we still cannot change the selected user name for which we're making the evaluation. Please, make this field editable, so that we can correct and amend scorecards efficiently. Thanks.5 votes
- Don't see your idea?