324 results found
-
Cumulative Report
Wants a cumulative report highlighting insight on specific agents to figure out which area they are failing in and or excelling in.
4 votes -
Create Custom Filters
Have the ability to create your own custom filters at the settings level (reports tab, scorecard, employee profile etc.) they would all be possible to use as filters. Example: you could have a category for a line of business so you can see results at an aggregate level without needing to export.
4 votes -
Add the ability to approve or remove the ability to skip interactions in WL
Analysts are skipping interactions that they consider too hard, too long or too low scoring and don't want to score, approving will make it easier to track
4 votes -
"Live" workloads, not looking at past interactions
Currently you need to set up workloads based on past interactions, I can't set up a workload to find one call randomly per agent for calls taken this week unless I re-assign a workload everyday and still the analyst will need to keep note on who've they've evaluated and who they haven't
4 votes -
When searching an interaction manually, seeing if it has been skipped in a workload
I often get flagged interactions from other areas of the business, when searching the interaction manually under filters, it would be great if this is assigned in a current workload or was skipped in a past workload.
4 votes -
Select multiple angents in the agent report and multiple teams in the team report
I'd like to select multiple agents in the new agent report and multiple teams in the team report.
I'd like to compare the selected items whenever I need to.3 votes -
''Set N/A Answer'' as ''action'' to Rules
Currently, you can only select ''Fail Section'', ''Fail All,'' and ''Notify'' options as ''Actions'' if a rule is met in Scorecards. Adding ''Set N/A Answer'' would be a neat addition because some criteria makes others redundant in certain scorecards. This would be great for efficiency.
3 votes -
Option for stand alone reviews
Create a standalone review which is not tied to one specific evaluation.
A review is tied to an individual evaluation at the moment. We want to use the review scorecard to combine the results of multiple evaluated transactions or calibrations.
This way, we can use the review to summarize the analysts' performance in one official document, which makes it easier to understand patterns and set focus points.
We already plan to start doing this, with linking the individual calibrations within the review via custom fields. However, the review being linked to one specific evaluation can be confusing for the analyst…
3 votes -
To be able to organize the agents in the workload by alphabetic order
To be able to organize the agents in the workload by alphabetic order so it easier to find them
3 votes -
Toggle between daily, weekly, monthly views
When viewing a Quality report, it would be good to be able to toggle the measure showing between daily/weekly/monthly rather than it automatically choosing the measure to show based on the timeframe
3 votes -
Fail All for Review
Like an Agent Scorecard, please allow a "fail all" type for questions on a Review Scorecard.
3 votes -
Improve workloads % distribution logic (evaluations count per analyst)
Even though every Quality Specialist has a specific distribution rate (%), same analysts have less tickets assigned than others, week after week. Ideally, Playvox would keep an eye on the overall distribution over the time of each workload to ensure that each analyst receives roughly the same amount of tickets to evaluate.
3 votes -
"Connect" questions from different scorecards for a combined reporting
We have several scorecards for different channels, but some statements are the same across all scorecards (e.g. "Was the agent friendly?"). We are currently combing all data into an big excel sheet to get an overall picture because that's not possible in Playvox. We would have to select each scorecard separately and look at different results.
It's possible for us with Insights as well, but we would really like a similar "out-of-the-box" feature.
3 votes -
Adding 'Vertical' and 'Contact reason' of the ticket on top of the scorecard.
In order to be able to get more information from the evaluations report, it would be great to add the specific 'vertical' and 'contact reason' of the ticket that's being evaluated, on the scorecard information (same place where we see the agents name, the TL, interaction number, etc.)
3 votes -
transcription
Please consider adding transcription to audio files. This allows analysts to review longer calls without having to waste time listening to them. If an additional 'Highlighting' feature is added then you can also leave comments and feedback on specific areas of a call. This would be a huge product improvement on the QA side.
3 votes -
Skip evalutation
When you're skipping one chat/ticket in workload, another one is not
loading instead of skipped one, and that reduce the total amount of chats.3 votes -
Ability to archive scorecards without impacting Calibrations / ATA
If we archive scorecards, then Playvox doesn't allow Calibrations / ATA to be completed for evaluations completed using the archived scorecard. This means when we revamp scorecards, QAs will see both old and new scorecards when creating an evaluation. To only show one, we have to create a complete separate team.
3 votes -
dashboard edits
the main dashboards need to be editable. e.g. there are certain statistics which we consider more important e.g. fail-alls.- for us this should be top and centre of the dashboard. "errors" are not important and could be removed
3 votes -
Ability for team leaders/managers to flag interactions that need to be reviewed
My org has team leaders that routinely escalate cases that need to be reviewed that are typically outside of workloads and on the spot to evaluate. Currently there is no way for a team leader/manager to flag an interaction in Playvox that needs to be reviewed by another analyst (the manager/lead is not doing the reviewing) and this is a manual effort that is captured in google spreadsheets.
It would be critical to have the ability to flag an interaction for review through the interactions tab, have a dropdown of categories for the analyst for the reason for review, leave…
3 votes -
Calibration Due Time
Currently the calibration feature allows you to only set a due date (end of day). We would like to be able to set up a datetime calibration results are due (eg. 9/29/2022 @ 4pm) This would allow us a bit more flexibility in how long we can allow users to provide their inputs.
3 votes
- Don't see your idea?