Skip to content

Quality

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

70 results found

  1. Redistribute evaluations across multiple analysts (Team Leaders etc.) for both the substitutions (on PTO) & the re-assignments

    21 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →

    Hello,


    We are happy to announce that this feature is now available in Playvox QM. If you want to know more you can check our October release documentation in the Help Center.


    Regards,

  2. When a dispute is submitted there is no notification via email to the valid parties and sometimes they are missed.

    I think an email should be sent to the Analyst's Team Leader to prevent disputes being missed.

    19 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Disputes  ·  Admin →
    Completed  ·  Paulina Restrepo responded

    Hey!

    I'm excited to announce that this feature has been completed and released!


    If the "Notify leam leader when a dispute is submitted" option is enabled within the Playvox settings, the agent's team leader will receive both, a Playvox notification and an email informing them about this action.


    Please let me know your thoughts on this new experience and if it aligns with your needs!


    Warm regards,

    Pauli :)

  3. Have the ability to view and export the scorecard in a pdf format and print it. This is useful for meetings and for employee training sessions.
    Adding an edit

    18 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Scorecards  ·  Admin →
  4. If the agents are deactivated after the workload runs, the assigned evaluations for the agent still remains in QAs queue. However, QAs cannot evaluate the agent because the agent is inactive.

    16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
    Completed  ·  Paulina Restrepo responded

    Hey!

    I'm excited to announce that this feature has been completed and released!

    If enabled under the Quality settings, the interactions associated with deactivated agents will be removed from any active workload assignment! 


    Please let me know what are your thoughts on this new experience and if it aligns with your needs!

    Warm regards,

    Pauli :)

  5. When we assign the ETA workload, it first takes us to the calibration and then to the review screen. Could we have a disability feature to opt for the calibration or not in the workloads and that should directly take us to the review screen?

    Can we have this feature enabled for the Evaluate the Analyst workloads?

    15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
    Completed  ·  Paulina Restrepo responded

    Hey, 

    I'm happy to share that this idea has been completed and has been released in today's Customer Release.

    I'd love to hear your thoughts on it!


    - Pauli :)

  6. We would like to request that similar to agents receiving notifications in their email when n evaluation was done, dispute should also send email notification to email addresses of all respective stakholders.

    15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Disputes  ·  Admin →
  7. Currently, Workloads assign a static list of evaluations per analyst. This is not an efficient workflow for larger teams.

    A setting which ran workloads without analysts assignments would be helpful. The workload would run with the typical date, frequency and filter settings, but instead of assigning lists for each analyst, the user would add their analysts and allow them to work from an open 'bucket' of interactions.

    Analysts would take ownership of an interaction by completing the evaluation and it would be removed from the open queue of interactions.

    Users would be able to see which analysts completed evaluations and…

    15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →

    Hello,


    We are happy to announce that this feature is now available in Playvox QM. If you want to know more you can check our October release documentation in the Help Center.


    Regards,

  8. Marking evaluations that have received coaching. When a coach has selected an evaluation for Quality coaching, it should show in the Evaluation overview next to QA Creation date adding a Coaching date. This would help identifying if all critical quality coaching has been done and if it was done on time. As we are working with COPC guidelines, it would be very important to have a fast overview if all failed QAs have been coached on time.

    15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Evaluations  ·  Admin →

    Hello!


    We have good news. This was recently released.

    You can check it out in the Evaluations section.


    Regards,

    Ari from Product Management.

  9. We run weekly calibrations with multiple teams of auditors (sometimes up to 28 people)
    Manually adding each participant every week is very time consuming. Is there anyway we could create a calibration group with a set list of participants that we can create a new cali-b for, or an easy way to add participants as I've tested copying and pasting in names as a list and that doesn't work, I have to add them one by one.
    As we calibrate with the same groups of people week in and week out, this would be a valuable tool for us across…

    14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  10. The client would like to disable the option of deleting disputes from specific roles.

    14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Disputes  ·  Admin →
  11. Currently, there is no way to download/export the submitted reviews. We would like to have this enhancement to analyze the re-auditor findings in more detail.

    14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Evaluations  ·  Admin →
  12. When there are multiple analysts assigned to a workload, it would be great to have the ability to swap or relinquish an evaluation for a particular employee to another analyst. The purpose would be to eliminate potential bias, in the event that the analyst is the agent's direct manager or if there is a conflict between those parties that could lead to an assumption of bias.

    14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
  13. I would like for there to be a feature where once you have started a workload and finished your first evaluation, it automatically goes to the next evaluation in the workload.
    Currently, once I finish with an evaluation, I have to go back to the workload and start a new evaluation which creates unnecessary steps and has proven to be inefficient for my workflow.

    13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
    Completed  ·  Paulina Restrepo responded

    Hey! 

    I'm excited to announce that this feature has been completed and released! 

    Now you'll be able to efficiently evaluate tickets within a workload assignment, reducing time, effort, and clicks while completing this process! 


    Please let me know what are your thoughts on this new experience and if it aligns with your needs! 


    Warm regards, 

    Pauli :) 

     

  14. Could we add a bigger button to sign the evaluations? We have many agents complaining that they can't find the signature option when looking at their scorecard. The little check box is not obvious enough for them.

    13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Evaluations  ·  Admin →

    🎉 Exciting News! 🚀

    🌟 We've renovated the user experience for signing evaluations.

    🙌 Give it a try and let us know how it works for you. We are eager to hear your thoughts!

    Thank you for being a part of our community! 😊

    Karina from Product

  15. One of them is related to the possibility of changing the ticket agent, I mean, the ticket was transferred from one agent to another and the analyst is able to decide who shall be evaluated. Please see below the link to the recording. As the meeting was in Spanish, it will be ok to understand what they are asking

    "Hey Juan -- in the workload feature, it seems that very often the agent that Playvox is automatically determining to be the owner is in fact not the agent that we would like to evaluate. Is it possible to manually change the…

    9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
  16. Currently two same interactions will ever be assigned to different workload requests - which makes cross analysis/deep dives not possible. It also limits the sample size (workloads overlapping).

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →

    🎉 Exciting News! 🚀


    We are delighted to announce that this idea has been completed and released. 🌟 Please give the new feature a try and let us know how it works for you. 


    🙌 We are eager to hear your thoughts and feedback! Your input is invaluable in making Playvox even better.


    💬Here you can find more information on how this feature will work: https://help.playvox.com/hc/en-us/articles/5449370968339-Creating-Workloads-Evaluate-the-Agent


    Thank you for being a part of our community! 😊


    Karina from Product

  17. Someone else mentioned below regarding the timeframe to start a dispute. I wanted to also include an enhancement regarding how disputes are dated. Currently I'm running into the issue of missing disputes - I'm not sure when they were submitted AND recent disputes are not being shown week over week because they're dated based on the evaluation date and not when the dispute was submitted. This has been an issue with keeping up with disputes and missing them months later. This has metrics impact with updating data from prior months.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Disputes  ·  Admin →

    🎉 Exciting News! 🚀

    🌟 This idea has been completed and released. From now on, it will be possible to better identify the date by which you are filtering disputes and you will also be able to filter them by the date of creation or submission.

    🙌 Give it a try and let us know how it works for you. We are eager to hear your thoughts!

    Thank you for being a part of our community! 😊

    Karina from Product

  18. We currently have a 7 day period set for advisors to raise a dispute on an evaluation. We were given the understanding that the facility within Playvox allows us to control the submission of disputes automatically.

    However we have since discovered that the restriction only applies to the advisor starting the dispute within the evaluation and not when they submit it.

    If started within the 7 days, they can in fact then submit it whenever they wish, meaning we are getting disputes submitted weeks and months after the audit was created.

    This seems to make the function redundant as we…

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Disputes  ·  Admin →
  19. Even though the option in the user management for reviews says Manage reviews (create and update) , Reviews, currently cannot be updated after they have been submitted. We would like the option to update Reviews after they have been submitted as errors can happen and we want to be able to correct mistakes to have correct data and also make sure we provide correct feedback to evaluators.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Evaluations  ·  Admin →
  20. Upon submitting an evaluation review, there should be the capability to make edits to it. Currently, if an error is noticed after submitting the review, the only option is to delete it and resubmit a corrected version. However, this results in the original review having already been transmitted through our API call, and when the corrected review is resubmitted, as it has a new ID, this causes both the original and corrected reviews to be stored in our database, leading to inaccurate data.

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Evaluations  ·  Admin →
← Previous 1 3 4
  • Don't see your idea?