Skip to content

Quality

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

54 results found

  1. New Quality Reports: in the "performance over time" view it appears by week, in the current configuration even if you select the entire month, it does not make the comparison by week (example in the screenshot below).

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Reports  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Workloads: possibility to manage in batch, removing loads from X user that needs to be deactivated in batch.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Currently, for scorecards with a second evaluator, if the second evaluator is not selected, the evaluation process will encounter a loading delay, followed by a timeout error. Would like a solution so these audits don't get stuck pending.

    Ideally, someone can approve all the audits like this that are pending. Also, we'd like to be able to see who the first evaluator picked from the list to be the second evaluator.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Scorecards  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Instead of reassigning outstanding workload assignments, have the ability for the admin/TL to remove the incomplete workload assignments so the analyst can move onto the new assignment.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hey!

    I'm excited to announce that this feature has been completed and released!

    When managing a workload from the details screen, you'll be able to remove the interactions that have not been evaluated by a specific analyst. Make sure you explain the reason why you're doing so, and this record will be available in the workload's log. 


    Please let me know what are your thoughts on this new experience and if it aligns with your needs!


    Warm regards,

    Pauli :)

  5. The notification bar is insufficient for informing Analysts that a review has been completed. There are so many notifications that many of our analysts had no idea that they were receiving reviews.
    An option to send emails, making it function the same as an analyst completing the marking of a specialist's ticket, would ensure they were aware of the marking they are receiving.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Evaluations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. When we assign the ETA workload, it first takes us to the calibration and then to the review screen. Could we have a disability feature to opt for the calibration or not in the workloads and that should directly take us to the review screen?

    Can we have this feature enabled for the Evaluate the Analyst workloads?

    15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. We can view the Date and Time stamp under “Date Created” column but when we export the report, there is no entry for the Time Stamp, only the date shows. Please see attached image.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Reports  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    🎉 Exciting News! 

    🚀We are delighted to announce that this idea has been completed and released. 🌟 Please give the new feature a try and let us know how it works for you. 

    🙌 We are eager to hear your thoughts and feedback! Your input is invaluable in making Playvox even better.

    Thank you for being a part of our community! 😊

    Karina from Product

  8. If the agents are deactivated after the workload runs, the assigned evaluations for the agent still remains in QAs queue. However, QAs cannot evaluate the agent because the agent is inactive.

    16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hey!

    I'm excited to announce that this feature has been completed and released!

    If enabled under the Quality settings, the interactions associated with deactivated agents will be removed from any active workload assignment! 


    Please let me know what are your thoughts on this new experience and if it aligns with your needs!

    Warm regards,

    Pauli :)

  9. Add "Expired" status in the Dispute Status Filer.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Disputes  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Currently two same interactions will ever be assigned to different workload requests - which makes cross analysis/deep dives not possible. It also limits the sample size (workloads overlapping).

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    🎉 Exciting News! 🚀


    We are delighted to announce that this idea has been completed and released. 🌟 Please give the new feature a try and let us know how it works for you. 


    🙌 We are eager to hear your thoughts and feedback! Your input is invaluable in making Playvox even better.


    💬Here you can find more information on how this feature will work: https://help.playvox.com/hc/en-us/articles/5449370968339-Creating-Workloads-Evaluate-the-Agent


    Thank you for being a part of our community! 😊


    Karina from Product

  11. Currently, if there's an active dispute an agent can't acknowledge an evaluation unless it will be closed or deleted by the arbitrator. However, for expired disputes which are considered not actual disputes the ability or restriction to acknowledge also applies. Meaning even if the status is expired agents are barred from acknowledging it. Hopefully we can lift this restriction and allow agent to acknowledge evaluations with expired disputes. As a workaround, users with admin access or option to delete expired disputes remove it manually so rep can acknowledge it on Playvox. Lifting this option will save effort from both agent…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Disputes  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. We run weekly calibrations with multiple teams of auditors (sometimes up to 28 people)
    Manually adding each participant every week is very time consuming. Is there anyway we could create a calibration group with a set list of participants that we can create a new cali-b for, or an easy way to add participants as I've tested copying and pasting in names as a list and that doesn't work, I have to add them one by one.
    As we calibrate with the same groups of people week in and week out, this would be a valuable tool for us across…

    14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. It would be helpful if TL's/QL's had an option to set automatic reminders for agents to review and sign/dispute their evaluations on Playvox. This would help to reduce the amount of time agents spend forgetting to sign evaluations within the set timeframes, and it would also help to reduce the time spent on sending reminders manually.

    By setting up automatic reminders, TL's/QL's can ensure that agents are aware of their evaluations and are prompted to complete them within the required timeframes. This could lead to faster resolution of any issues or concerns that arise, which could improve overall agent performance…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Evaluations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. The ability to automate calibrations, similar to workloads. Currently, calibrations can be found in Interactions, but this is a manual process that is time consuming. It would be great if there was an option to 'build' a calibration (what filter it pulls from, date range, who's included, etc) and have the system pull the evaluation for you.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Calibrations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Our QA Analysts have to click the questions that they do not cover during their coaching sessions. They'd like to have the ability to uncheck all of the questions when clicking the section name (See image attached).

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Coaching  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. The client would like to disable the option of deleting disputes from specific roles.

    14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Disputes  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Currently, PlayVox is set up to only allow us to grade the last interaction on a ticket when a workload is sent. For example, for agent "Joe Smith," a workload will only look for tickets where "Joe Smith" was the last one to touch the ticket.

    It would be great to be able to grade other interactions in the ticket as well, such as in the beginning or the middle, and have PlayVox assign those as part of a workload. I would want our QC team to have the ability to grade tickets where "Joe Smith" interacted with a customer…

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Completed  ·  4 comments  ·  Evaluations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Currently, there is no way to download/export the submitted reviews. We would like to have this enhancement to analyze the re-auditor findings in more detail.

    14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Evaluations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Add reporting for required feedback options on scorecard. Ex: when points aren't given and an analyst gets prompted to give feedback, they select the main reason for the deduction. Would like to see what the main contributors are to errors (something like a more detailed version of coaching opportunities by question in advanced reports)

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Reports  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. We would like to request that similar to agents receiving notifications in their email when n evaluation was done, dispute should also send email notification to email addresses of all respective stakholders.

    15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Disputes  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
← Previous 1 3
  • Don't see your idea?