60 results found
-
Report and Filter Use Case by Case Reasons
Monthly, the case reason data is necessary for reporting for the following reasons:
(1) Determine which case reasons are Met and Not Met %.
(2) Have visibility on the count and types of evaluated case reasons.
(3) Know the specific areas for improvement by case reasons that our agents needed for a refresher/training, and coaching.**The custom field feature in Playvox does not generate the above-mentioned data report we needed. We are looking forward to the generation of this "feature" option so that we can eliminate manual tracking and report data seamlessly and quickly.
2 votes -
Add the ability to insert GIF into Evaluation Comments
Include the GIF capability in the Evaluation Comment section, next to the upload files and emoji insert.
1 vote -
Delete comments in evaluations
We need to be able to delete comments made in evaluations
1 vote -
General Info and Conversation tabs.
When we review a conversation, we click the “General Info” tab, and then click “Conversation”, but the conversation goes back to the beginning and not where we left it.
As a team, we believe it would be nice for the conversation to stay where we left it, just to avoid scrolling a bit more.
1 vote -
Marking an agent as out of office/sick/vacation
After sending a workload that can't be edited, we would like to be able to mark employees if they're on vacation or sick so we can know the reason that the analyst didn't complete their workload, also for future reference as there is no data to prove why this employee hasn't been evaluated.
include columns for start and end dates, as well as the reason for the absence.
4 votes -
Be able to add justification to evaluations if agent did not sign (mandatory process)
We need to have the ability to add a justification if the agent does not sign the evaluation. For us this is a mandatory process that we need to track for control and regulatory reasons. Currently, this capability is not available, and its inclusion would significantly improve our processes. The justification would be added by the team leader.
1 vote -
Search evaluations using agent email
Be able to quickly search for evaluations using the agents email address, not full name
1 vote -
Unify format of value field in answers' feedback in evaluations
We'd like to fetch the feedback data from the answers in the evaluations.
When doing that we faced an error that comes from the fact that the "value" field inside the feedback object has both string (for Multiple Choice feedback options) and array (for Checkboxes) types of data.
So to be able to fetch that field, it should always be an array of string(s).
1 vote -
Playvox QM Chrome Extension for Evaluations
Chrome extension so that analysts can fill in the scorecard directly within the CRM for CRMs that do not have an out of the box integration.
1 vote -
An option to delay evaluation prescheduled release date.
Example -
For a QAed Case which has already been evaluated and scheduled on the tool, lets say for a deadline of Oct 20, we should have an option to revise the release date to a new deadline incase I want to make some changes to the evals or get it reviewed further and hence delay the evaluation delivery.1 vote -
Ability to set 'interaction creation date' and 'interaction resolution date' as standard fields in evaluation
The most important data when reviewing the evaluation is the interaction create date or/and resolution date, not the interaction evaluation date as currently shown as default in the evaluation.
As of now, the 'interaction create date' and 'resolution date' need to be added as custom field. We want the possibility to set the fields as "Standard" for all scorecards and evaluations
(See support ticket #29227)
1 vote -
Changing the user/agent selected even after evaluation is saved/sent
Changing the user/agent selected even after evaluation is saved/sent.
We should be able to change the user/agent selected even after evaluation is saved/sent. We can currently change the date, time, link to the interaction, etc. BUT we still cannot change the selected user name for which we're making the evaluation. Please, make this field editable, so that we can correct and amend scorecards efficiently. Thanks.5 votes -
Interaction ID - Show Interaction ID as fetched from the integration (allow more than numbers and letters in the ID name)
Chat/Ticket ID's are generated with hyphens in our CRM tool.
Example: 4da9099a-c6bd-4641-9cf1-cbedc5279a7fHowever, Playvox is automatically removing the hyphens when the Interaction ID is created. This makes manual search time-consuming for our Quality Analyst team since they have to remove the hyphens before searching in Playvox.
Please allow the Interaction ID's to contain hyphens as well
1 vote -
Same mistakes
Possibility to check the same mistakes the agents make inside the evaluation and deduct more points.
2 votes -
Disable the 'evaluate' button for all tickets that had been 'evaluated'
Have the option in Playvox to disable the 'evaluate' button for all tickets that had been 'evaluated' so te customer (Message Media) can avoid duplicate evaluations in the future.
2 votes -
View All Quality Evaluation Drafts
It would be very helpful if the admin and super admin role could see all drafted evaluations on the platform, not just the ones they started. Evaluations are tied to other parts of the platform, like scorecards, and having the ability to edit and delete other draft evaluations would be great!
2 votes -
Ability to edit and dispute Evaluation Reviews
Upon submitting an evaluation review, there should be the capability to make edits to it. Currently, if an error is noticed after submitting the review, the only option is to delete it and resubmit a corrected version. However, this results in the original review having already been transmitted through our API call, and when the corrected review is resubmitted, as it has a new ID, this causes both the original and corrected reviews to be stored in our database, leading to inaccurate data.
Additionally, there should be the ability for our evaluators to challenge evaluation reviews, similar to how agents…
4 votes -
Ability to submit an evaluation with an anonymous analyst for specific roles or evaluations
Currently it is possible to submit an evaluation with an anonymous analyst but it applies to ALL analysts (evaluations + disputes) across the board.
There are specific processes/situations where would be helpful to be able to anonymize the evaluator (like evaluations among Senior QAs and Managers, for example).1 vote -
To be able to view Audit Logs without having the ability to edit evaluations
Currently to allow users access to view the Audit logs, they have to be given access to be able to edit evaluations.
This is causing us problems, as users want to be able to view this, but we don't want these users to have the ability to edit audits, compounded by the fact you can't report on audits that have been edited so we can't even monitor this.1 vote -
Create evaluations / profile options
Within the role administration we need a separate option to (de)activate the posibility of creating evaluations within or outside of a workload. Although you can check in the report if a workload was used or not, the idea is to shut that option down and have only random contacts selected by the system and not by the evaluator.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?