Skip to content

Quality

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

309 results found

  1. The ability to increase the number of users in calibrations, up to 500, through an upload feature. Currently, users have to be manually and individually selected.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Calibrations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. We'd love to add an option on the scorecards to prevent QA Analysts from entering dates set in the future. This causes some discrepancies in their data.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Scorecards  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Scorecards: PlayVox currently offers the option of creating tags within a criterion, but does not generate a report on them, we understand that if there is information in a scorecard criterion it is relevant and that is why we insert it, therefore it could have synthetic this in some scorecard report.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Scorecards  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Reviews: does not deliver reports on offenders, we are unable to see which scorecard review criteria the person made the most mistakes, so we continue using it as a quality scorecard that delivers this report, in addition to feeling that viewing the evaluation does not have the same quality than that of the normal assessment.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Scorecards: lack of option to attach images to criteria comments.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Scorecards  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Confidence coefficient: today we develop this manually, but a statistical data that guarantees the quality of the sample is the confidence coefficient; If Playvox made this automatic calculation available, it would greatly facilitate the creation of workloads and also the monthly result of the reliability of the evaluations sent.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Disputes: it does not generate reports that would be very important for us, such as a comparison of evaluations sent, contested, accepted and not accepted, both by analyst, agent, team and scorecard, we have to do this manually outside of Playvox.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Disputes  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Workloads: justify the non-evaluation of an agent, in the case of vacation, certificate, exclude this person from the load and insert a justification for the leader.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Workloads: they are inactivated as soon as the period for them to be completed ends but they still appear to the analyst as pending, however if we delete them so they no longer appear to the analyst, they also no longer appear in the workload reports.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. We need to have the ability to add a justification if the agent does not sign the evaluation. For us this is a mandatory process that we need to track for control and regulatory reasons. Currently, this capability is not available, and its inclusion would significantly improve our processes. The justification would be added by the team leader.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Evaluations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Be able to quickly search for evaluations using the agents email address, not full name

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  1 comment  ·  Evaluations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. We'd like to fetch the feedback data from the answers in the evaluations.

    When doing that we faced an error that comes from the fact that the "value" field inside the feedback object has both string (for Multiple Choice feedback options) and array (for Checkboxes) types of data.

    So to be able to fetch that field, it should always be an array of string(s).

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Evaluations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. To be able to organize the agents in the workload by alphabetic order so it easier to find them

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. We need to have an exportable report that captures errors found within a section of an evaluation, and includes comments by the analyst.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Reports  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Participation lists for Calibrations have been implemented (yay!) but they cannot be edited or deleted after creation. We need this to be added ASAP

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  3 comments  ·  Calibrations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. There is always an error message when editing the time. It needs to have an 6 hour time difference to make any changes to the time of releasing the workload, which is unnecessary.

    Flexibility to edit a workload after it has been started is desired.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Chrome extension so that analysts can fill in the scorecard directly within the CRM for CRMs that do not have an out of the box integration.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Evaluations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. When viewing a Quality report, it would be good to be able to toggle the measure showing between daily/weekly/monthly rather than it automatically choosing the measure to show based on the timeframe

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  1 comment  ·  Reports  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Example -
    For a QAed Case which has already been evaluated and scheduled on the tool, lets say for a deadline of Oct 20, we should have an option to revise the release date to a new deadline incase I want to make some changes to the evals or get it reviewed further and hence delay the evaluation delivery.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Evaluations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. For the NA answers on the scorecards, make an option to either make it a 0, or the same score as the YES answer. So many teams want the second option and that means you have to manually enter the NA with the same points as YES.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Scorecards  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?