344 results found
-
Evaluate the analysts: Type of sampling
Allow sampling by scorecard and doesn't require us to select QA Analysts names. Instead workload will pull every QA Analysts who completed an audit for that particular scorecard. Current process is challenging to add and remove QA Analyst for clients with multiple BPOs and sites.
Additionally, Playvox blank out QAs when QAs are removed from the program but not in time to remove them from the workload list. Please see attachment
1 vote -
Reporting Across Multiple Time Zones
Allow users in a different time zone to report on "Last Month", and "Last Week" data at a default time, without the results being skewed by their local time zones. This will ensure data is being accurately represented across our business without the user having to update their time zone settings each time.
1 vote -
Scorecard permissions split out editing & viewing
When setting permissions for scorecards it's not possible to allow someone to view and not edit. For certain roles ideally, it would be good to allow viewing but be unable to create or edit existing scorecards.
2 votes -
Comments on evaluations tab
Could we add a tab where all the evaluations where comments where made from the agents can more easily be found?
As a Manager and Admin it can be hard to find the evaluations where comments made. Having a feed/tab where these evaluations can be collected and easily filtered through would be a great addition and improvement!
1 vote -
deletion
Our security team requires we delete (or securely archive) old evaluation data. Deleting thousands of evaluations individually is not feasible.
A process to bulk (securely archive) or delete evaluations is necessary for many organizations from a compliance perspective!
2 votes -
Ability to export data with User custom fields information
User custom fields (such as Site, Vendor, etc.) data from User management can be used to filter audits in the Evaluation tab, but this data is excluded from exports of the data. Having this in the data would be beneficial.
1 vote -
Business intelligence section - not visible for agents
Having the option to add a section to the scorecard that can be hidden from the agent and does not affect the agent Quality score. Purpose of the section would be to collect business intelligence information from the interactions evaluated, like customer feedback about the product or service, procedures that make support difficult or increase customer effort. Together with CSAT surveys this will give extremely valuable insight into the business.
2 votes -
Ability to export data with a single data dump
Currently, whenever we try to download data, we receive a bunch of files with various scorecard names. Could all of the data be contained on a single sheet & tab?
1 vote -
Workload sampling issue: creating the total sample using > quantity
Workload pulls the latest x number of interactions. Based on UAT observations, we've noticed that workload fully sampled ~15 minutes (23:45 till midnight), while ignoring remaining interactions within the 2 day time frame.
We require random sampling to be able to use this feature.
1 vote -
Auto population for all multiple choice fields in scorecard instead of seeing "Select an option"
When we test out scorecards with "Preview", all the first options for multiple choice fields are automatically selected. However, when QAs use scorecards for actual audits, all the fields are showing "Select an option" as default which requires a number of clicks per audit. Is it possible to have multiple choice fields to auto populate the first options?
1 vote -
Disputes - In addition to the Analyst, the Manager can be flagged.
Zocdoc is looking for that when the agent opens a dispute and it goes directly to the original evaluator, it can also flag someone else in the team, in this case a manager.
2 votes -
Skip evalutation
When you're skipping one chat/ticket in workload, another one is not
loading instead of skipped one, and that reduce the total amount of chats.3 votes -
Permission option - ability to view disputes for anlyzed evaluations
Scenario: There is a team of agents that are evaluating agents from other teams - performing an analyst task.
Problem: As they don't have a specific team assigned, they are not able to view disputes related to the evaluations they performed/analyzed.
Solution: The easiest way would be to have an option in the employee role for view dispute for analysed evaluations.1 vote -
Ability to set a fixed number in a workload to analyst's distribution.
Currently, the analyst distribution step in a workload only lets us distribute a percentage of the estimated interaction volume to be assigned. We need to be able to set a fixed number for each QA analyst to distribute the estimated volume. That way, across multiple workloads every week we can determine their total assignment.
13 votes -
1 vote
-
Notify Analyst when standalone interaction is already assigned in Workloads
When an Analyst enters an interaction ID into a Standalone workload, they should get a visual notification if that interaction is already assigned, evaluated, or calibrated so that they don't unintentionally double up on scoring and interfere with agent's QA averages.
1 vote -
To improve time tracking with the "Save Draft" function for Evaluations
When an evaluator is in the process of evaluating an interaction but needs to pause for another urgent task, the evaluator can select 'Save Draft', however, there is no explicit or clear sign that the time has been paused when they click this option. What could be good is to add a banner of some kind stating time has been paused or how much time has been spent on it so far or when the evaluator selects this option, the page could redirect them to all their evaluations and they can look up their drafts under the 'Drafts' filter. This…
1 vote -
Add display of agents who are expected to have interactions assigned, but no available interactions were found
When workloads are assigned to specific agents within a team, but not the entire team, it's difficult to figure out which agents don't have interactions available, but are supposed to.
In the image of agent assignments, the first two 0/0 are on the team, but were never added to interaction assignments in the workload configuration. An agent who was added to assignments and should have 4/4 but has 0, will also show as 0/0. Adding a clear distinction of who is missing interactions will make it much easier to follow up.
2 votes -
Button to exclude 'Not applicable' during 'Scorecard overview' report
The current view shows N/A as part of the calculation. Would be great to have a button to exclude 'Not applicable' if needed so that the % of occurrence would show only the % from when the question was applicable.
2 votes -
Delete or archive Workloads Skipping Categories
We created a few Skipping Categories that were relevant at the time but no longer have any use case. It would be helpful to either delete or archive these categories so the dropdown list of all selectable items becomes short and "clean" again.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?