286 results found
-
Scorecard Language Selection
We use an external analytics tool in order to do all deeper dives into advisor and scorecard developments, etc... The problem we currently face: we evaluate some advisors in ENGLISH, others in GERMAN - thus, we use two different scorecards, meaning we have to merge the results of BOTH SCORECARDS in order to get a full picture of what is happening.
It would be AMAZING if Playvox gave one the option to create a PARENT Scorecard with CHILD Scorecards for translations into different languages - meaning regardless of which language I am evaluating in, ALL results are merged for export…
1 vote -
User management
It would be convenient to be able to designate a unique TL for each agent as we currently have agents working under the same team manager but managing different products
1 vote -
Same mistakes
Possibility to check the same mistakes the agents make inside the evaluation and deduct more points.
2 votes -
Custom Reports (beta)
right now the new quality reports beta feature is good but we can't share out custom reports (even though it says "Here you'll find custom report views to be reused or shared with your team" in app), would love to be able to share this feature!
1 vote -
"Connect" questions from different scorecards for a combined reporting
We have several scorecards for different channels, but some statements are the same across all scorecards (e.g. "Was the agent friendly?"). We are currently combing all data into an big excel sheet to get an overall picture because that's not possible in Playvox. We would have to select each scorecard separately and look at different results.
It's possible for us with Insights as well, but we would really like a similar "out-of-the-box" feature.
3 votes -
Ranking for Quality report
It would be great if we could have a view in the report that actually shows the ranking of all agents instead of only the top and bottom 5. So we can show all the report to our team and see the complete list of results
1 vote -
Seconds in interactions
There is no second's information in the time stamp of the texts communicated in FreshChat and Salesforce discussions. By this, The quality team will not be able to obtain accurate results when analyzing criteria like active listening and holding time. If at all possible, the information from the second's conversation should be added to both platforms.
1 vote -
Secondary Assessor by outcome
We would like scorecards to have the option of a second checker but only IF a certain outcome is achieved.
e.g. if the quality score is below standard, it should go to a second checker1 vote -
Disable the 'evaluate' button for all tickets that had been 'evaluated'
Have the option in Playvox to disable the 'evaluate' button for all tickets that had been 'evaluated' so te customer (Message Media) can avoid duplicate evaluations in the future.
2 votes -
Ability to exclude users from a Quality Workload
Instead of having users randomly assigned in a workload, we'd like to see a feature that allows us to exclude certain users. For example, there are analysts who also take calls in these queues but we don’t want them to get assigned to audit themselves.
1 vote -
Ability to Adjust Dispute Notifications
Currently QA Leadership (i.e. Admins, Super Admins) is not notified when a dispute is submitted, but they assign arbitrators and review submissions. Adding notifications for them is important for timely management of disputes.
8 votes -
Ability to edit and dispute Evaluation Reviews
Upon submitting an evaluation review, there should be the capability to make edits to it. Currently, if an error is noticed after submitting the review, the only option is to delete it and resubmit a corrected version. However, this results in the original review having already been transmitted through our API call, and when the corrected review is resubmitted, as it has a new ID, this causes both the original and corrected reviews to be stored in our database, leading to inaccurate data.
Additionally, there should be the ability for our evaluators to challenge evaluation reviews, similar to how agents…
5 votes -
Edit Multiple Scorecards
Enable the option to edit multiple scorecards by create always a new tab when clicking the edit button
1 vote -
Evaluate the Analyst Dispute feature
Can we have a Dispute functionality enabled for the Evaluate the Analyst workloads? This would help the Analyst to Dispute their evaluation with the evaluator and seek for score change.
14 votes -
Automated Quality Coaching Recommendations
The user can set the percentage that triggers the coaching session recommendation
Options to trigger the coaching recomendation:
Question or section score
critical fail5 votes -
New Reports - "Quaity Overview
In the new reports - "Quality Overview" - in "Quality by Score" - Scorecards, have the possibility to see the Av. Qa Score above the bar, and not only when clicking on the bar.
Customer: MessageMedia1 vote -
"Transfer" button in the Interactions Tab
Possibility to have the "Transfer" button that we have in the Workloads, but also in the Interactions Tab.
Customer - MessageMedia1 vote -
Adding 'Vertical' and 'Contact reason' of the ticket on top of the scorecard.
In order to be able to get more information from the evaluations report, it would be great to add the specific 'vertical' and 'contact reason' of the ticket that's being evaluated, on the scorecard information (same place where we see the agents name, the TL, interaction number, etc.)
3 votes -
Custom report - Number of records
Can we add the number of evaluations/audits/records that have been completed per agent on the Quality Score by section for the Custom Reports? We believe it would be really helpful to see not only their QA average score, but the number of times every agent was evaluated during a certain period of time.
2 votes -
Ability to submit an evaluation with an anonymous analyst for specific roles or evaluations
Currently it is possible to submit an evaluation with an anonymous analyst but it applies to ALL analysts (evaluations + disputes) across the board.
There are specific processes/situations where would be helpful to be able to anonymize the evaluator (like evaluations among Senior QAs and Managers, for example).1 vote
- Don't see your idea?