326 results found
-
Reports flexibility and schedule export
It would be wonderful if we could have to ability to have more customization to build our own reports and export them on a schedule. Our analyst team struggles to properly analyze the data from QA because the data points are spread across many different reports. For instance, our analysts award a badge on a weekly basis. To figure who has won the badge for the week, we have to go to reports>agents, then look through every agent, one agent at a time to find the highest score. We should just be able to look at one page with all…
14 votes -
excel naming convention
the evaluation export function creates excel spreadsheets with very long naming conventions. If you pull the same report a few says later, it has the same name. Excel cannot have 2 workbooks open with the same name. please can each unique download be given a unique file name
1 vote -
6 votes
-
Report that lists any agents NOT allocated to a workload
We would really benefit from being able to run a report to confirm any agents that are NOT allocated to a workload.
It is confirmed via User Management if an agent is assigned to an active workload, so there is some kind of link of this data in the system.
Going forward and extension to this request would be to be able to export a report that lists all agents and what workloads they are allocated to.
4 votes -
Blind Audits
Hide the name of the agent during the Evaluation process, as this will reduce the bias between Monitor and Agent.
8 votes -
Show Evaluation info inside Dispute
Would like to be able to view the evaluation that came from the dispute within the same tab itself in order to recall the interaction versus having to open another tab and toggle between both.
12 votes -
Ability to use decimals in a workload for QA assignment
We need the ability to use decimals when dividing the estimated volume to QAs in a workload. I.e. Currently, if you have 5,000 interactions estimated to be divided among 100 QAs the difference between the allocation of 1% (50 interactions) and 2% (100 interactions) is not providing a fair distribution.
5 votes -
Scheduled Scorecards Publishing
It'd be great if we can schedule when a new scorecard will be published and the previous version archived. This can help us to avoid having multiple excel files in a work week when exporting the data.
1 vote -
See the drafted version of the evaluation they started earlier on the actual workload
Whenever the analyst is completing a workload, the client would like to see the drafted version of the evaluation they started earlier on the actual workload without needing to go to the "draft" tab. Also, to avoid confusion the client would want to have only one draft per ticket/ evaluation and not multiple for every time he saves that same evaluation as a draft.
5 votes -
Permission for team members to see the team's evaluations without being a Team Leader
We've got a request that the agent wants to see the evaluations of another agent for improvement. However, it can't be done in the current setting without putting the whole team in the Team Leader in the 'Teams' setting.
2 votes -
Dispute chat
It would be nice to directly chat with the agent from the Dispute tab. In our company the Disputes are solved by a 3rd party and not the initial analyst. That's why communication between the 3rd party and the agent would be amazing.
2 votes -
Pull reports on evaluation time, average time, time per analyst.
We can export evaluations from the quality tab which also exports the evaluation time however this is not formatted in a way that we can easily see the average evaluation time per analyst. This is really important when you have a whole team of analysts and need to see some clarity on how they manage their time especially if not meeting their workloads.
10 votes -
Custom field topic/question filter selection
Please add an option in the custom field filter to be able to select the question/topic and show the report of this question/topic. Now we need to add one-by-one answers.
2 votes -
Allow more than 1000 interactions when sampling by quantity
"Create the Total Sampling Using: Quantity" sampling does not allow a number bigger than 1000
3 votes -
Remember filter settings when going back to the page.
Do not reset the filters when revisiting the page. For example in Dispute Reports, when I review the dispute it opens in the same tab. When I go back to the previous page it resets the filter and have to redo them. This behavior is also inconsistent across the platform as some pages do remember filter settings.
2 votes -
Edit Internal Notes
Currently, there is no option to edit internal notes submitted on evaluations. If we want to edit them, they need to be submitted again with the correct text and this might cause confusion with our agents.
2 votes -
interactions - description field
Description in Response history looks different from response history in the interactions:
The description in the interactions displays with the descriptions style : spaces\ new lines\ bold text and more1 vote -
List assigned evaluations in chronological order
Evaluations assigned via workloads should be showed to Analysts in chronological order, with older first and newest last. If we do weekly evaluations, then the time gap between ticket resolution to evaluated can be up to 13 days.
Ex.
Ticket resolved on Aug 1st, 2022
Ticket assigned to Analyst on Aug 8th, 2022 via workloads.
Analyst evaluates ticket on Aug 14th, 2022.2 votes -
Enable filtering by excluding certain teams / scorecards
Currently you can only filter results by selecting the teams / scorecards you want to include. However, when we want to see results of all teams / scorecards except for one, then we have to select all the teams except the one we want to exclude. We need an option to exclude teams / scorecards from results.
2 votes -
Option of replacing completed evaluations with Expert feedback/score after calibrations
Currently, when reviewing the outcomes of calibrations, they may result in score adjustments to the original evaluation and it is a manual action taken right now. If we could have a button as an option to replace the original evaluation score with the expert's updated feedback/scoring and have a banner that it was updated due to calibration #, that could potentially be more efficient. Ideally keeping the original evaluation timestamp/date/analyst associated with it.
4 votes
- Don't see your idea?