27 results found
-
When a dispute is submitted an email should be sent to the supervisor/team leader or others that have permissions.
When a dispute is submitted there is no notification via email to the valid parties and sometimes they are missed.
I think an email should be sent to the Analyst's Team Leader to prevent disputes being missed.
3 votes -
Dispute Closed Date
We would like to have the Closed Date for the disputes that are completed. This could be added on the Dispute details (when you open them) or as a column on the Disputes table.
1 vote -
Hello Playvox Team, We would like to have a feature request for the overview of disputes. Could we also get a filter overview here, wher
Hello Playvox Team,
We would like to have a feature request for the overview of disputes.
Could we also get a filter overview here, where we can also save the filters without always having to reset them.
We have noticed that we don't always have a good overview and therefore disputes have not been seen and the deadline has expired without processing.
1 vote -
Evaluate the Analyst Dispute feature
Can we have a Dispute functionality enabled for the Evaluate the Analyst workloads? This would help the Analyst to Dispute their evaluation with the evaluator and seek for score change.
13 votes -
Turn Disputes on by Platform
Ability to turn Quality Disputes on or off by scorecard, not by role.
1 vote -
Dispute Filter: Expired
Add "Expired" status in the Dispute Status Filer.
1 vote -
Ability to Adjust Dispute Notifications
Currently QA Leadership (i.e. Admins, Super Admins) is not notified when a dispute is submitted, but they assign arbitrators and review submissions. Adding notifications for them is important for timely management of disputes.
5 votes -
AUTO REMOVAL OF EXPIRED DISPUTES
Currently, if there's an active dispute an agent can't acknowledge an evaluation unless it will be closed or deleted by the arbitrator. However, for expired disputes which are considered not actual disputes the ability or restriction to acknowledge also applies. Meaning even if the status is expired agents are barred from acknowledging it. Hopefully we can lift this restriction and allow agent to acknowledge evaluations with expired disputes. As a workaround, users with admin access or option to delete expired disputes remove it manually so rep can acknowledge it on Playvox. Lifting this option will save effort from both agent…
1 vote -
Edit Button on Playvox for closed Disputes
For Dispute, once the case assigned to an Arbitrator gets closed, we do not have the edit access on playvox to change the decision.
If we need to make changes after closing Disputes, we have to create a new evaluation with the same information and submit a dispute again.1 vote -
Disputes - In addition to the Analyst, the Manager can be flagged.
Zocdoc is looking for that when the agent opens a dispute and it goes directly to the original evaluator, it can also flag someone else in the team, in this case a manager.
2 votes -
Permission option - ability to view disputes for anlyzed evaluations
Scenario: There is a team of agents that are evaluating agents from other teams - performing an analyst task.
Problem: As they don't have a specific team assigned, they are not able to view disputes related to the evaluations they performed/analyzed.
Solution: The easiest way would be to have an option in the employee role for view dispute for analysed evaluations.1 vote -
Disputes be dated from the date they were submitted and not the original evaluation date
Someone else mentioned below regarding the timeframe to start a dispute. I wanted to also include an enhancement regarding how disputes are dated. Currently I'm running into the issue of missing disputes - I'm not sure when they were submitted AND recent disputes are not being shown week over week because they're dated based on the evaluation date and not when the dispute was submitted. This has been an issue with keeping up with disputes and missing them months later. This has metrics impact with updating data from prior months.
7 votes -
Use different term than "Rejected"
Our quality is heavily soft skill focused, and the Red "Rejected" notice is not ideal. I wonder if a different term could be used instead. Even "Denied" or "No changes warranted" might be less abrasive. Also, maybe a different color than red?
6 votes -
Ability to dispute ETAs
QAs cannot dispute ETAs as they are categorized as a calibration.
3 votes -
Level 2 Dispute
It would be good if agents can make an appeal or can still comment after a dispute has been resolved.
There are instances that agents still have concerns or questions after their disputes get resolved but there is no way for them or evaluators to re-open the cases.
9 votes -
100% Evaluation
Cannot open a dispute, if there is a 100% evaluation, but quality manager cannot see something, so teamleader re-checked, and open dispute to lower the score.
2 votes -
dispute
Allow Disputes to edit the evaluation either up or down - currently can only accept a change and increase the score, but if the dispute is incorrect and the score should be lower, we cannot make that change. This is for when using a score range.
2 votes -
Advanced Dispute Reporting
Currently, the information from the dispute export is fairly limited. Being able to export data such as which question(s) were disputed would be helpful in seeing trends with agents or evaluators. This way, we can see if it is a specific question that an agent or evaluator may have a misunderstanding of, or if there are other factors that may affect a certain question being disputed more frequently than others.
8 votes -
Show Evaluation info inside Dispute
Would like to be able to view the evaluation that came from the dispute within the same tab itself in order to recall the interaction versus having to open another tab and toggle between both.
9 votes -
Alert when disputes are started
My company is trying out Disputes for the first time and I noticed that as a super admin, I'm not alerted when disputes are started. It would be great to have a feature where I'm alerted given we don't have the auto assignment of analysts turned on and it's manual assignment of the case owner's manager as part of our process. Would also be cool if there was a way to auto assign the case owner's manager using the Case Info tab from Salesforce - that would help with the extra step of assigning the manager to review. My hope…
11 votes
- Don't see your idea?