62 results found
-
Live Filter date range on Evaluations tab
On the evaluations tab, it would be great to have an all "live" filter for the date filter.
Insted of locking the end date, have this end date to be live and updated for the current date.3 votes -
Feedback summary to be at the top of the evaluation
It would be great for the feedback summary to be viewed at the top of the evaluation so the agent can read the overall summary and then delve into the particulars of each criterion.
3 votes -
Report and Filter Use Case by Case Reasons
Monthly, the case reason data is necessary for reporting for the following reasons:
(1) Determine which case reasons are Met and Not Met %.
(2) Have visibility on the count and types of evaluated case reasons.
(3) Know the specific areas for improvement by case reasons that our agents needed for a refresher/training, and coaching.**The custom field feature in Playvox does not generate the above-mentioned data report we needed. We are looking forward to the generation of this "feature" option so that we can eliminate manual tracking and report data seamlessly and quickly.
2 votes -
Same mistakes
Possibility to check the same mistakes the agents make inside the evaluation and deduct more points.
2 votes -
Disable the 'evaluate' button for all tickets that had been 'evaluated'
Have the option in Playvox to disable the 'evaluate' button for all tickets that had been 'evaluated' so te customer (Message Media) can avoid duplicate evaluations in the future.
2 votes -
Add internal note to evaluations that are scheduled
Ability to add an internal note to evaluations that are scheduled vs. completed
2 votes -
Edit Internal Notes
Currently, there is no option to edit internal notes submitted on evaluations. If we want to edit them, they need to be submitted again with the correct text and this might cause confusion with our agents.
2 votes -
Enable filtering by excluding certain teams / scorecards
Currently you can only filter results by selecting the teams / scorecards you want to include. However, when we want to see results of all teams / scorecards except for one, then we have to select all the teams except the one we want to exclude. We need an option to exclude teams / scorecards from results.
2 votes -
Separate Evaluate the Analyst data from Calibration data
The two are processes are not the same and should not reside and recorded as the same type. Evaluate the Analyst and Reviews data should be combined into one process.
2 votes -
See and filter who the evaluation is assigned to (second evaluator)
In the evaluations listed, see who the evaluation is assigned to, the second evaluator it was transferred to; without having to open the evaluation. And to be able to filter this by Second Evaluator in the Evaluations section.
2 votes -
Filter by interaction/call date
Ability to filter the evaluations by the interaction or call date, rather than just the 'Created date'. This enables us to easily export reports based on when the call was made aside from when the call was evaluated. This eliminates the need for us to open every evaluation to see if the call date falls on the current or previous month.
2 votes -
Option for the scorecard sections to be collapsed when opened for evaluation
Consider adding an option for the scorecard sections to be collapsed when opened for evaluation. This makes the scorecard well-ordered and saves time for the QA Analysts from scrolling through each sections, especially for the sections containing multiple questions. In practice QA Analysts are well-aware of all evaluation criteria and there's no need to look into every single question.
2 votes -
Option to hide/omit evaluation result percentages, colors, answer scoring scale.
There needs to be an option to hide/omit the evaluation results colors on questions and sections, hide/omit the evaluation section percentage score, hide/omit the question answer number score. See attached screenshot for the items referenced.
The colors, section percentage score, question number score are distracting and confusing to the end users.
The staff person receiving the results fails to look at the actual rating focusing instead on the colors, percentage or the numbers which can be misleading. If you aren't using a binary answer option then you have the high possibility of running into this situation.
Our business use case…
1 vote -
Granular viewing access for Analyst Reviews
An option so individuals can view their own reviews, reviews that have been completed by their peers, but be unable to view reviews completed ON their peers.
To support checks by internal Quality teams on BPO Quality teams.
1 vote -
Add the ability to insert GIF into Evaluation Comments
Include the GIF capability in the Evaluation Comment section, next to the upload files and emoji insert.
1 vote -
Delete comments in evaluations
We need to be able to delete comments made in evaluations
1 vote -
General Info and Conversation tabs.
When we review a conversation, we click the “General Info” tab, and then click “Conversation”, but the conversation goes back to the beginning and not where we left it.
As a team, we believe it would be nice for the conversation to stay where we left it, just to avoid scrolling a bit more.
1 vote -
Be able to add justification to evaluations if agent did not sign (mandatory process)
We need to have the ability to add a justification if the agent does not sign the evaluation. For us this is a mandatory process that we need to track for control and regulatory reasons. Currently, this capability is not available, and its inclusion would significantly improve our processes. The justification would be added by the team leader.
1 vote -
Unify format of value field in answers' feedback in evaluations
We'd like to fetch the feedback data from the answers in the evaluations.
When doing that we faced an error that comes from the fact that the "value" field inside the feedback object has both string (for Multiple Choice feedback options) and array (for Checkboxes) types of data.
So to be able to fetch that field, it should always be an array of string(s).
1 vote -
Playvox QM Chrome Extension for Evaluations
Chrome extension so that analysts can fill in the scorecard directly within the CRM for CRMs that do not have an out of the box integration.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?