Skip to content

Quality

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

344 results found

  1. Currently, workloads that are scheduled to run daily will run everyday. We do not have the ability to restrict workloads from running on certain days. If, for example, all of our QAs are off on weekends, we want to be able for the workload to not run on Saturday or Sunday.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  2 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Ability to snooze assignments or set as 0% so the QA doesn't have to be removed from the workload if they are OOO.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  1 comment  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. It's very difficult to determine what percentage has already been assigned amongst QAs in the workloads. With 40+ QAs, it is very difficult how many more percentage has to be assigned/deassigned to reach 100%

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Currently the Workloads API can only return information of workloads that have ran. If scheduled workload information is retrievable, it will help with sampling and managing the workloads before it runs.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Do not reset the filters when revisiting the page. For example in Dispute Reports, when I review the dispute it opens in the same tab. When I go back to the previous page it resets the filter and have to redo them. This behavior is also inconsistent across the platform as some pages do remember filter settings.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Disputes  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Users are able to edit evaluations after it is signed by agents. Since evaluation has been signed, the result has been accepted by the agent. Users should not be able to edit evaluations afterwards. If the edit was a markdown, then it will record as agent acknowledging the markdown and non disputable.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Evaluations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Can we have a Dispute functionality enabled for the Evaluate the Analyst workloads? This would help the Analyst to Dispute their evaluation with the evaluator and seek for score change.

    16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  2 comments  ·  Disputes  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Currently, there is no option to edit internal notes submitted on evaluations. If we want to edit them, they need to be submitted again with the correct text and this might cause confusion with our agents.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Evaluations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. When an Analyst is added / removed from a workload, it redistributes the evaluations equally amongst all Analysts. This requires us to take note of existing distribution and then recreate them. It should not reset distribution by default and users should be able to click on a button to reset it if needed.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Evaluations assigned via workloads should be showed to Analysts in chronological order, with older first and newest last. If we do weekly evaluations, then the time gap between ticket resolution to evaluated can be up to 13 days.

    Ex.
    Ticket resolved on Aug 1st, 2022
    Ticket assigned to Analyst on Aug 8th, 2022 via workloads.
    Analyst evaluates ticket on Aug 14th, 2022.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. How AHT is measured currently is inaccurate. Currently, the AHT clock starts when the Analysts click on the "Start Evaluation" button. However, the interaction is reviewable even before the Analyst clicks on the button. We also cannot instruct the Analysts to NOT review before clicking, as the Analysts can only skip before clicking the "Start Evaluation" button. Thus, Analysts have to review the ticket beforehand to determine whether to skip the ticket or not.

    The AHT clock should start before the analyst can review the interaction and the evaluation made skippable even after starting the evaluation. Record the time from…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Evaluations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Currently, users can only be searched using a single name (i.e. Mike, Arun, Luke). With 7000+ agents, the list Playvox returns can get multiple pages. Please allow searching by their full names.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Currently you can only filter results by selecting the teams / scorecards you want to include. However, when we want to see results of all teams / scorecards except for one, then we have to select all the teams except the one we want to exclude. We need an option to exclude teams / scorecards from results.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Evaluations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. The two are processes are not the same and should not reside and recorded as the same type. Evaluate the Analyst and Reviews data should be combined into one process.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Evaluations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. When an evaluation gets deleted, it marks it as "Not Evaluated" for the analyst, impacting their completion rate. It should not impact their completion rate if deleted. It's sometimes out of QA's control.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Workloads  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. We recently went through some attrition and had to deactivate some agents, we noticed that even though the agents are deactivated all of their evaluations are still affecting our overall QA and the only way to get rid of these is to delete them. Currently, the only way around this reporting-wise is to look into Insights, or more so manually via our analytics team.

    Would love to see an option introduced where maybe we can archive these reviews when an agent is deactivated instead of deleting them, so we can toggle this information when needed.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Reports  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. It would be nice if we can export reports of scorecards (e.g. "Select report" --> "Coaching opportunities by question").

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Reports  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Would it be possible to include a spell/grammar check functionality?

    Most QA scorecards have a section for grammar, formatting, punctuation, etc. In the current version of Playvox, there is no spell/grammar check functionality. Furthermore, you are UNABLE to copy the text from the corecard as that click function is to highlight only (unable to copy). The workaround is to leave the tool, go to the original ticket, and then copy/paste the text in a word doc.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  1 comment  ·  Scorecards  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. An agent can choose not to sign an evaluation, but it would be good to know if at least the opened it once and read it.

    If he decides to sign it, it we be good to see when the evaluation was signed (ex: 2 weeks after the evaluation was sent to him, or the next day?)

    We can see in the activity log this info, but only if we manually go into each evaluation.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  0 comments  ·  Reports  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. In the evaluations listed, see who the evaluation is assigned to, the second evaluator it was transferred to; without having to open the evaluation. And to be able to filter this by Second Evaluator in the Evaluations section.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Acknowleged  ·  2 comments  ·  Evaluations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?