341 results found
-
Ability to dispute Evaluation Reviews
There should be the ability for our evaluators to challenge evaluation reviews, similar to how agents can dispute evaluations.
11 votesHi there!
Thank you for sharing your ideas with us!
Your idea will be carefully evaluated. If it gains traction, it could significantly influence our development roadmap.
Thanks for being a valuable part of our community.
Karina from Product
-
Ability to dispute the feedback options selected in the audit
We can currently dispute scores, which is great, but we rely heavily on the Feedback Options for our reporting to understand what went wrong.
We also report on this level of error per advisor in many markets, and this means we get disputes that don't necessarily impact the score, but impact the feedback options selected.
Currently we can't accept a dispute to change only the feedback options, we have to change the score.
So this means we currently 'reject' the dispute - which is misleading, and then manually edit the original audit so the reporting data is correct.
Ideally we…
9 votes -
New Report Tab update missing some of the basics
We think the new insights are helpful and love the new graphics, tables, and figures we get out of this new set up on the Reporting tab in Playvox.
We have noticed that it is missing some of the basic insights like:
• Seeing the individual evaluations rather than just the amount of evaluations and being able to click on them to open up and review them.
• Being able to select more than one Agent, Team, and ScorecardsWe also noticed that our Team Lead role doesn't have access to the Scorecard report option. I couldn't see anything under…
6 votes -
Option to Skip interaction in Workloads using multiple filters
As an analyst, I want to have access to the option to Skip interactions when a workload is created using multiple filters.
2 votes -
Improve Reviews function under Quality: Format feedback and comments
Reviews functions under Quality (Review the reviewer/analyst):
2. When composing reviews, there is no option to edit font, highlight, add links, ... even it doesn't have any paragraph break, the review looks messy/untidy. It would be better to have similar format as Evaluations for better organizing and following up.1 vote -
Share dispute results with the analyst when a dispute is accepted
As the QA manager, I want to share the outcome of accepted disputes with the analyst whose evaluation was disputed so that the analyst can receive information that will enable him/her to improve his/her personal evaluation process.
The method by which the results are shared could be:
- An email
- A coaching session that is triggered by an automatically accepted dispute
- A coaching session associated with the dispute that is created manuallyIf you see this idea and feel an affinity with it, please leave in the comments how you would like to share the dispute results with…
5 votes -
Ability to update super admin roles without support tickets
The ability to update a Super Admin role directly within the platform without needing to raise a support ticket. This enhancement would allow for quicker and more efficient management of Super Admin roles.
To ensure security, a check should be implemented to confirm that there is at least one active Super Admin before allowing any changes. This is particularly important when the site owner, who might also be a Super Admin, needs their role updated. Enabling this feature would streamline the process and reduce reliance on support for role management.
2 votes -
Possibility to hide evaluations from the Agents
We need to be able to evaluate agents, and hide only some evaluations from theor view (to be able to select which evaluations to make visible for agents and which not). Therefore, if they check their profile, they wont be able to see the evaluations that we don´t want to. For example: we want to do audits with investigation purpose, but we don´t want to give visibility to the agents so these audits wont have any impact on them.
I know we have the option when doing an evaluation to mark if we want to send the notification to agent…
6 votes -
Workloads - Can the number of ticket be editable?
The number of case should be set as default, or at least we can choose one of them (number/ percentage) separately. We cannot choose number of the percentage only and it doesn't reflect exactly what we want to see.
1 vote -
Select multiple angents in the agent report and multiple teams in the team report
I'd like to select multiple agents in the new agent report and multiple teams in the team report.
I'd like to compare the selected items whenever I need to.3 votes -
Option to hide/omit evaluation result percentages, colors, answer scoring scale.
There needs to be an option to hide/omit the evaluation results colors on questions and sections, hide/omit the evaluation section percentage score, hide/omit the question answer number score. See attached screenshot for the items referenced.
The colors, section percentage score, question number score are distracting and confusing to the end users.
The staff person receiving the results fails to look at the actual rating focusing instead on the colors, percentage or the numbers which can be misleading. If you aren't using a binary answer option then you have the high possibility of running into this situation.
Our business use case…
3 votes -
Sign evaluation automatically if X days had pass
Automatically let Playvox sign the evaluation if 30 days had pass and no dispute is open.
1 vote -
Clone Filters
Clone filters from 1 Playvox instance to multiple instances.
It will be beneficial to clone filters from 1 Playvox instance to multiple instances.
Rather than creating filters every time for each instance, it will be helpful if we could clone filters.
This will save us time and work.1 vote -
Users to Notify
I just need your support regarding the "users to notify" option as I used to select 23 users for each evaluation. if we can make it easier t
1 vote -
Peer calibration feature for analyst evaluations
We are looking to implement a peer calibration process where analysts evaluate each other's completed evaluations/reviews to assess scoring consistency and alignment with quality standards.
The process should involve:
Selection: Choose a completed evaluation for each evaluator.
Assignment: Assign other team members to evaluate the same case.
Comparison: Compare the results to identify scoring misalignments across quality standards.Currently, this process is manual and requires significant effort to manage and analyze. We request a dedicated feature in Playvox that allows us to:
Select and assign evaluations for peer review.
Facilitate the comparison of results among evaluators.
Identify and address scoring…2 votes -
Ability to display case number instead of case ID in interactions and workloads tabs
Currently, in the interactions tab and workloads tab within Salesforce, the default reference ID displayed is the Case ID. However, our team primarily uses the Case Number as our reference across all other reporting tools, including Tableau. This mismatch creates additional work on the backend as we have to manually match the Case ID with the Case Number for accurate reporting.
We are requesting the ability to change the default reference ID from Case ID to Case Number in these tabs. This change would align with our reporting needs, streamline our workflow, and reduce the time spent on manual data…
2 votes -
Ability to identify the origin of completed evaluations - the ability to check if the completed case is from a workload or not.
In the evaluation tab, it would be incredibly useful to have a feature that identifies whether a completed evaluation originated from an assigned workload or from the interaction tab. Currently, there is no clear way to determine where the evaluation was initially triggered, which can lead to confusion and difficulty in tracking the source of evaluations.
Implementing a feature that tags or highlights the origin of the evaluation—whether it came from a workload or directly from the interaction tab—would enhance clarity and improve the management of evaluations. This would provide evaluators and managers with better insights and allow for more…
2 votesHi there!
Thank you for sharing your idea with us!
We will thoroughly evaluate it, and if it gains traction, it could greatly impact our roadmap.
We appreciate your contribution to our community.
Karina from Product
-
Hierarchy - Multi-Site Functionality - the amalgamation of multiple instances into one.
The addition of an additional permission tier that will allow the amalgamation of multiple instances into one. This will allow reporting at an enterprise level, as we do not utilize any of the current reporting because it is site/instance-specific.
Brief specifications on how we would like the multi-site functionality to work -
Permission Tier:
Sits above the current "Team" level, consolidating multiple Teams.
Users with Group-level access can manage and compare data across all Teams within the Group.Consolidated Reporting:
Enables reporting across different instances/sites, allowing enterprise-level analytics.
Group-level users can generate reports that compare performance across Teams and instances.…
2 votes -
Customize notifications for calibrations
It would be great to be able to customise the notifications related to calibration sessions. At the moment this setting is not customisable and every time an interaction is added to calibration session, the participants receive an email.
1 vote -
Hide questions marked N/A to the agent in the evaluation result page
We don't want to show the questions marked with N/A to agents on the Evaluations results page. So there's less noise on the page.
2 votes
- Don't see your idea?