344 results found
-
"Connect" questions from different scorecards for a combined reporting
We have several scorecards for different channels, but some statements are the same across all scorecards (e.g. "Was the agent friendly?"). We are currently combing all data into an big excel sheet to get an overall picture because that's not possible in Playvox. We would have to select each scorecard separately and look at different results.
It's possible for us with Insights as well, but we would really like a similar "out-of-the-box" feature.
3 votes -
Additional tile for previous week's evaluation to show next to the 'tickets', 'comments' and 'metrics' tab
If would be great if we could add a link to the previous evaluation or a tile where we can find a shortcut to the evaluation's reports.
1 vote -
Adding 'Vertical' and 'Contact reason' of the ticket on top of the scorecard.
In order to be able to get more information from the evaluations report, it would be great to add the specific 'vertical' and 'contact reason' of the ticket that's being evaluated, on the scorecard information (same place where we see the agents name, the TL, interaction number, etc.)
3 votes -
Custom report - Number of records
Can we add the number of evaluations/audits/records that have been completed per agent on the Quality Score by section for the Custom Reports? We believe it would be really helpful to see not only their QA average score, but the number of times every agent was evaluated during a certain period of time.
2 votes -
Allow tickets to sync from Zendesk in Standalone workloads
When using a Standalone workload, the ticket ID input doesn't pull up the interaction in Playvox so analysts can't use the full scoring features, like highlighting text. This results in longer evaluation time and less specific feedback
1 vote -
Ability to force comments when the answer is negative/error.
So that we can choose to make the comment mandatory on certain questions when marking an error. If not possible to do it for just certain questions, it would still help to be able to enable this for all questions when marking an error.
2 votes -
transcription
Please consider adding transcription to audio files. This allows analysts to review longer calls without having to waste time listening to them. If an additional 'Highlighting' feature is added then you can also leave comments and feedback on specific areas of a call. This would be a huge product improvement on the QA side.
3 votes -
Filter added to QA Reporting for Inactive Users
It would be nice to have the QA Reporting add a filter in for ´active users´ and ´inactive users´. When running MTD QA performance it would be useful and more accurate to filter out any of the inactive users.
1 vote -
Changing the user/agent selected even after evaluation is saved/sent
Changing the user/agent selected even after evaluation is saved/sent.
We should be able to change the user/agent selected even after evaluation is saved/sent. We can currently change the date, time, link to the interaction, etc. BUT we still cannot change the selected user name for which we're making the evaluation. Please, make this field editable, so that we can correct and amend scorecards efficiently. Thanks.5 votes -
Scorecard permissions split out editing & viewing
When setting permissions for scorecards it's not possible to allow someone to view and not edit. For certain roles ideally, it would be good to allow viewing but be unable to create or edit existing scorecards.
2 votes -
Ability to select feedback reasons from 2 answer options
We current have the possibility to mark a question as Delivered, Almost There or On it's Way.
Almost There and On it's Way answers require feedback options to be selected so we can better understand why the agent did not achieve a Delivered score.
However sometime we mark the lowest scoring option 'On it's Way' and select the relevant feedback options, but the agent also displayed some of the feedback options from the 'Almost Delivered' feedback reasons, but we are unable to select these. From a reporting and feedback to agent POV it would be great to be able to…1 vote -
Reviews: Start a review from the review tab
Like the Calibration tab, allow a Review to be started from the Review tab, instead of just being able to start a Review from an evaluation.
1 vote -
Option to show only Effectiveness (pass rate) instead of QA score
We would like our agents to see the Effectiveness score or pass rate of their evaluations rather than the QA score as we work with COPC standards. Also in the reporting section and the Recommendations pass rate or Critical error rate would be more significant and helpful for our quality program.
1 vote -
Business intelligence section - not visible for agents
Having the option to add a section to the scorecard that can be hidden from the agent and does not affect the agent Quality score. Purpose of the section would be to collect business intelligence information from the interactions evaluated, like customer feedback about the product or service, procedures that make support difficult or increase customer effort. Together with CSAT surveys this will give extremely valuable insight into the business.
2 votes -
Disputes - In addition to the Analyst, the Manager can be flagged.
Zocdoc is looking for that when the agent opens a dispute and it goes directly to the original evaluator, it can also flag someone else in the team, in this case a manager.
2 votes -
Add feedback options to scale question type
We use feedback options as "tags" to create more reporting insights. Currently this option is only available if we go with a "Points" based question type. This can be setup with Points, but a slider or scale option has a nicer look and keeps the scorecard more condensed (it takes several seconds to scroll a scorecard with several points answers and feedback options).
1 vote -
Export agent stats per scorecard
The ability to export Quality Agent Results. Go to Reports > Agent tab > View Reports > View Details. Currently, it's not possible to export this summary. We report on score per section per agent, and having the ability to export this would help with reporting needs.
1 vote -
Improve the consistency of the header names between the Evaluator Review export and the Playvox report
There is an inconsistency in the naming of fields in the Evaluator review reporting. Specifically, there is a discrepancy between the field names in the Playvox review tab and the header names in the Export report. For instance, the field called "Reviewer" in the Playvox report is referred to as "Analyst" in the export report. Another example is the field called "Analyst" in the Playvox report is named "Reviewed_by" in the export report. This lack of clarity can easily result in reporting mistakes.
1 vote -
Review tab filters (Evaluate the analyst)
Currently, when exporting Evaluate the analyst reviews, there are very limited filter options. The biggest pain point is that there is no date range filter, so every export contains ALL completed reviews to date, which is far from ideal as it is not efficient and leads to additional manual work to isolate the required date range. I would like to recommend the addition of a date range filter and another filter for the Reviewer so that we can track and trend Reviewer productivity and scoring trends.
4 votes -
Export should include highlights
The exported file should include any highlights and the comments that were attached.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?