328 results found
-
Ability to set the days of the week (ex. M - F) when workloads will run
Currently, workloads that are scheduled to run daily will run everyday. We do not have the ability to restrict workloads from running on certain days. If, for example, all of our QAs are off on weekends, we want to be able for the workload to not run on Saturday or Sunday.
4 votes -
Add internal note to evaluations that are scheduled
Ability to add an internal note to evaluations that are scheduled vs. completed
2 votes -
Filter added to QA Reporting for Inactive Users
It would be nice to have the QA Reporting add a filter in for ´active users´ and ´inactive users´. When running MTD QA performance it would be useful and more accurate to filter out any of the inactive users.
1 vote -
Restrict the result view for participants of a calibration to their own result only
Currently calibrations results form part of our auditors KPI's. Being able to see how everyone else is performing in calibrations is causing problems and could mean we are unable to continue to move from our calibrations from our current platform, and into Playvox.
Please can there be the ability within roles management to set what any role can view eg: own, team, all. Thank you.7 votes -
Ability to select feedback reasons from 2 answer options
We current have the possibility to mark a question as Delivered, Almost There or On it's Way.
Almost There and On it's Way answers require feedback options to be selected so we can better understand why the agent did not achieve a Delivered score.
However sometime we mark the lowest scoring option 'On it's Way' and select the relevant feedback options, but the agent also displayed some of the feedback options from the 'Almost Delivered' feedback reasons, but we are unable to select these. From a reporting and feedback to agent POV it would be great to be able to…1 vote -
Evaluations increase or decrease based on QA score
The client would like to have automated workloads. The number of evaluations increases when the agent's overall QA score is low and the number of evaluations decrease when the agent's overall QA score is high.
10 votes -
Reviews: Start a review from the review tab
Like the Calibration tab, allow a Review to be started from the Review tab, instead of just being able to start a Review from an evaluation.
1 vote -
Reporting trends
Report dashboard that can be filtered by agent, by scorecard type, by team, etc. that will show the trend per section, trend by questions, etc. and at the same time include the evaluation comment for each occurrences. Rather than going back to the actual evaluation to review them individually.
18 votes -
Use different term than "Rejected"
Our quality is heavily soft skill focused, and the Red "Rejected" notice is not ideal. I wonder if a different term could be used instead. Even "Denied" or "No changes warranted" might be less abrasive. Also, maybe a different color than red?
9 votes -
Evaluate the Analyst/Reviews: Add Time Tracker information
We would like to be able to track the time to complete (similar to Evaluations), so that we can track QA productivity as well as compare original auditing time to evaluator review time.
4 votes -
Option to show only Effectiveness (pass rate) instead of QA score
We would like our agents to see the Effectiveness score or pass rate of their evaluations rather than the QA score as we work with COPC standards. Also in the reporting section and the Recommendations pass rate or Critical error rate would be more significant and helpful for our quality program.
1 vote -
evaluate the analyst workload reassignment
Include the reassignment feature thats available for the "evaluate the agent" workloads and extend to "evaluate the analyst" so I'm able to reassign a new analyst to help with calibrations.
6 votes -
Add feedback options to scale question type
We use feedback options as "tags" to create more reporting insights. Currently this option is only available if we go with a "Points" based question type. This can be setup with Points, but a slider or scale option has a nicer look and keeps the scorecard more condensed (it takes several seconds to scroll a scorecard with several points answers and feedback options).
1 vote -
Export agent stats per scorecard
The ability to export Quality Agent Results. Go to Reports > Agent tab > View Reports > View Details. Currently, it's not possible to export this summary. We report on score per section per agent, and having the ability to export this would help with reporting needs.
1 vote -
Ability to archive scorecards without impacting Calibrations / ATA
If we archive scorecards, then Playvox doesn't allow Calibrations / ATA to be completed for evaluations completed using the archived scorecard. This means when we revamp scorecards, QAs will see both old and new scorecards when creating an evaluation. To only show one, we have to create a complete separate team.
3 votes -
Add display of agents who are expected to have interactions assigned, but no available interactions were found
When workloads are assigned to specific agents within a team, but not the entire team, it's difficult to figure out which agents don't have interactions available, but are supposed to.
In the image of agent assignments, the first two 0/0 are on the team, but were never added to interaction assignments in the workload configuration. An agent who was added to assignments and should have 4/4 but has 0, will also show as 0/0. Adding a clear distinction of who is missing interactions will make it much easier to follow up.
2 votes -
Populate links within email/customer interaction when reviewing evaluations
A few of my analysts and myself have come across the issue of hyperlinks not showing up when evaluating. Portions of the interaction that are hyperlinked look like plain, regular text while evaluating and appears as though there aren't any when there are.
This has caused unintentional mark offs for agents for not including a link to resources when there was in the Salesforce case. This has only become a recent issue. If possible, can we have the hyperlinks included (again) when evaluating? It does appear to show in the interaction itself before clicking to start evaluation but not during…6 votes -
dashboard edits
the main dashboards need to be editable. e.g. there are certain statistics which we consider more important e.g. fail-alls.- for us this should be top and centre of the dashboard. "errors" are not important and could be removed
3 votes -
Ability for team leaders/managers to flag interactions that need to be reviewed
My org has team leaders that routinely escalate cases that need to be reviewed that are typically outside of workloads and on the spot to evaluate. Currently there is no way for a team leader/manager to flag an interaction in Playvox that needs to be reviewed by another analyst (the manager/lead is not doing the reviewing) and this is a manual effort that is captured in google spreadsheets.
It would be critical to have the ability to flag an interaction for review through the interactions tab, have a dropdown of categories for the analyst for the reason for review, leave…
3 votes -
Export should include highlights
The exported file should include any highlights and the comments that were attached.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?